Paper · 2003 · Xi'nan Nongye Daxue xuebao

YIELD-IMPROVING EFFECT OF RHIZOSPHERE ASSOCIATE NITROGEN-FIXING BACTERIA ON MAIZE WHEAT AND SWEET POTATO

Song Guang-yu

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Yield of wheat, maize and sweet potato was increased by 10.9%~28.5%, 18.5%~28.2% and 68.3%~77.5%, respectively, by inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BN. N fertilizer rate (75 kg N/hm~2 vs. 105 kg N/hm~2) had no significant influence on the yield-improving effect of the strains. No significant difference was observed among the strains studied in their yield-improving effect for the 3 crops. The treatment of the liquid culture of the rhizosphere associative N-fixing bacterium AN3 gave a yield improvement of wheat comparable to that of 15 kg N/hm~2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased wheat yield by 10.9%~28.5%.

Treatment
inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BNe0
Interactor
associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BNe0symbiont
Outcome
Yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.9%~28.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of wheat, maize and sweet potato was increased by 10.9%~28.5%, 18.5%~28.2% and 68.3%~77.5%, respectively, by inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased maize yield by 18.5%~28.2%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BNe0
Interactor
associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BNe0symbiont
Outcome
Yield of wheat, maize and sweet potatoe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.5%~28.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of wheat, maize and sweet potato was increased by 10.9%~28.5%, 18.5%~28.2% and 68.3%~77.5%, respectively, by inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased sweet potato yield by 68.3%~77.5%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BNe0
Interactor
associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BNe0symbiont
Outcome
Yield of wheat, maize and sweet potatoe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
68.3%~77.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of wheat, maize and sweet potato was increased by 10.9%~28.5%, 18.5%~28.2% and 68.3%~77.5%, respectively, by inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer rate had no significant influence on the yield improvement from bacterial strains.

Taxon
wheat, maize and sweet potatoIpomoea batatasTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
N fertilizer rate (75 kg N/hm~2 vs. 105 kg N/hm~2)e0
Outcome
yield-improving effect of the strainse0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer rate (75 kg N/hm~2 vs. 105 kg N/hm~2) had no significant influence on the yield-improving effect of the strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of wheat, maize and sweet potato was increased by 10.9%~28.5%, 18.5%~28.2% and 68.3%~77.5%, respectively, by inoculation with the associative nitrogen-fixing bacterium strains CN18, CN52 and BN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial strains did not differ significantly in yield improvement across the three crops.

Taxon
MAIZE WHEAT AND SWEET POTATOt0
Material
strains studiede0
Outcome
yield-improving effecte0
Direction
No significant differencee0

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference was observed among the strains studied in their yield-improving effect for the 3 crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“YIELD-IMPROVING EFFECT OF RHIZOSPHERE ASSOCIATE NITROGEN-FIXING BACTERIA ON MAIZE WHEAT AND SWEET POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AN3 liquid culture improved wheat yield comparably to 15 kg N/hm~2.

Treatment
liquid culture of the rhizosphere associative N-fixing bacterium AN3e0
Interactor
rhizosphere associative N-fixing bacterium AN3e0symbiont
Outcome
yield improvement of wheate0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
15 kg N/hm~2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of the liquid culture of the rhizosphere associative N-fixing bacterium AN3 gave a yield improvement of wheat comparable to that of 15 kg N/hm~2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–599 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

inoculation · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.