Paper · 2007 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Relationships of transgenic Bt cotton variety and soil nutrients with the severity of red leaf blight

Zhang Zhan

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in 2003 and 2004 to observe the effects of transgenic Bt cotton and soil nutrients on red leaf blight of cotton. The systemic investigations reveal that the severity of red leaf blight of transgenic Bt cotton variety is higher than that of non-Bt cotton variety,the disease incidence and index of transgenic Bt cotton variety are 47.95%~79.45% and 12. 95~28. 25, respectively and those of non-Bt cotton variety are 32. 12%~55. 06% and 9.09~15.75,respectively. Incidence reveals that a significant difference between Bt cotton and non-Bt cotton varieties (P 0.05). The ginned cotton yield and the severity of red leaf blight present no significant difference (P 0.05) among six treatments of N, P, K fertilizer combination. This result shows no significant effects of N, P, K fertilizer on reducing the severity of disease. On the basis of the results,a new theory and some new methods are discussed for the disease control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red leaf blight severity was higher in transgenic Bt cotton than non-Bt cotton.

Material
transgenic Bt cotton varietye0
Outcome
severity of red leaf blighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-Bt cotton varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severity of red leaf blight of transgenic Bt cotton variety is higher than that of non-Bt cotton variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton disease incidence ranged from 47.95% to 79.45%, versus 32.12% to 55.06% for non-Bt cotton.

Material
transgenic Bt cotton varietye0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
47.95%~79.45%e0
Qualifier
32. 12%~55. 06%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence and index of transgenic Bt cotton variety are 47.95%~79.45% and 12. 95~28. 25, respectively and those of non-Bt cotton variety are 32. 12%~55. 06% and 9.09~15.75,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–487 · show in text ↑
e1

“red leaf blight of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton disease index ranged from 12.95 to 28.25, versus 9.09 to 15.75 for non-Bt.

Material
transgenic Bt cotton varietye0
Outcome
indexe0
Value
12. 95~28. 25e0
Qualifier
9.09~15.75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence and index of transgenic Bt cotton variety are 47.95%~79.45% and 12. 95~28. 25, respectively and those of non-Bt cotton variety are 32. 12%~55. 06% and 9.09~15.75,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–487 · show in text ↑
e1

“red leaf blight of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–140 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence differed significantly between Bt and non-Bt cotton varieties.

Material
Bt cottone0
Outcome
Incidencee0
Comparator
non-Bt cotton varietiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incidence reveals that a significant difference between Bt cotton and non-Bt cotton varieties (P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginned cotton yield did not differ significantly among six NPK fertilizer combinations.

Treatment
N, P, K fertilizer combinatione0
Outcome
ginned cotton yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
six treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ginned cotton yield and the severity of red leaf blight present no significant difference (P 0.05) among six treatments of N, P, K fertilizer combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red leaf blight severity did not differ significantly among six NPK combinations.

Treatment
N, P, K fertilizer combinatione0
Outcome
severity of red leaf blighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
six treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ginned cotton yield and the severity of red leaf blight present no significant difference (P 0.05) among six treatments of N, P, K fertilizer combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–750 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    K deficiency reduced seed mass by 4%

    Genotypic Interactions with Potassium and Nitrogen in Cotton of Varied Maturity · 1996 · compared with 112 kg ha −1 K

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

potassium · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 497 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.