Paper · 1999

Sugar maple: its characteristics and potentials

Ralph D. Nyland

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sugar maple dominates the northern hardwood forest, but grows over a broader geographic area. Conditions of soil and climate largely limit its distribution, and account for its less continuous cover along fringes of the range. Sugar maple regenerates readily following a wide range of overstory treatments. Success depends upon its status as advance regeneration, particularly under strategies favorable to less shade-tolerant species. In even-aged stands, trees of upper canopy positions grow well following release by cutting. Those of lower canopy positions do not. in uneven-aged stands, both small and large trees respond well to release. Diameter-limit cutting removes the best trees, often leaving stands in poor condition for growth and health. Damage to trees by natural agents and logging commonly leads to discoloration and decay, and often to dieback. Within the range of northern hardwoods, sugar maple seems generally healthy. Exceptions include stands damaged by defoliation, logging, and similar agents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar maple dominates northern hardwood forest.

Taxon
Sugar mapleAcer saccharume0
Outcome
dominates the northern hardwood foreste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar maple dominates the northern hardwood forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and climate largely limit its distribution.

Taxon
Sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Outcome
distributione0
Direction
limite0
Setting
soil and climatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conditions of soil and climate largely limit its distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar maple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar maple regenerates readily after varied overstory treatments.

Taxon
Sugar mapleAcer saccharume0
Treatment
overstory treatmentse0
Outcome
regenerates readilye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar maple regenerates readily following a wide range of overstory treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-canopy trees grow well after release cutting in even-aged stands.

Taxon
Sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment
release by cuttinge0
Outcome
grow welle0
Setting
even-aged standse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In even-aged stands, trees of upper canopy positions grow well following release by cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar maple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Small and large trees respond well to release in uneven-aged stands.

Taxon
Sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment
releasee0
Outcome
respond welle0
Setting
uneven-aged standse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in uneven-aged stands, both small and large trees respond well to release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar maple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Diameter-limit cutting leaves stands in poor growth and health condition.

Taxon
Sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment
Diameter-limit cuttinge0
Outcome
poor condition for growth and healthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diameter-limit cutting removes the best trees, often leaving stands in poor condition for growth and health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar maple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Acer saccharum (sugar maple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.