Paper · 2008 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Characteristics of Soil NO_3~- -N Changing and Nitrogen Mineralization During Spring Maize Seasons in the North China Plain

Wang Pu

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Relating to recommended nitrogen fertilization (RNF),soil NO_3~--N dynamics and nitrogen miner- alization in the North China Plain,most former research focused on winter wheat and summer maize,where- as almost no research involved spring maize.In order to further understand the advantages of RNF,and make the nitrogen fertilization strategy in spring maize season more reasonable.A field experiment included three nitrogen managements (zero nitrogen fertilization,ZNF;traditional nitrogen fertilization,TNF;rec- ommended nitrogen fertilization,RNF) focusing on characteristics of soil NO_3~--N dyna mics and nitrogen mineralization was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station.In TNF,NO_3~- -N content in 0-90 cm soil level showed a single peak curve,and the peak value was over 400 kg/hm~2.An ac- cumulation of NO_3~--N in 90-150 cm soil level was also found in TNF,that making a great threaten of ni- trogen leaching.ZNF presented a strong net nitrogen mineralization tendency,and a cooperativity between net N mineralization rate and plant growth rate was also found,however the soil nitrogen supplying capacity declined annually.In RNF,NO_3~--N content in 0-90 cm soil level was controlled in the range of 90~220 kg/hm~2,that not only ensured plants uptake normally,but also decreased N-leaching loss.In the three years,RNF saved 475 kg/km~2 nitrogen fertilizer totally,and improved nitrogen use efficiency 14%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under traditional nitrogen fertilization, soil NO3-N content in the 0-90 cm layer showed a single peak above 400 kg/hm2 in spring maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
TNFe1
Outcome
NO_3~--N content in 0-90 cm soil levele1
Value
over 400 kg/hm~2e1
Qualifier
single peak curvee1
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In TNF,NO_3~--N content in 0-90 cm soil level showed a single peak curve, and the peak value was over 400 kg/hm~2”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 701–814 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under traditional nitrogen fertilization, NO3-N accumulated in the 90-150 cm soil layer of spring maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
TNFe1
Outcome
NO_3~--N in 90-150 cm soil levele1
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“of NO_3~--N in 90-150 cm soil level was also found in TNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–890 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero nitrogen fertilization gave a strong net nitrogen mineralization tendency in spring maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZNFe3
Outcome
net nitrogen mineralization tendencye3
Qualifier
stronge3
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
e3

“ZNF presented a strong net nitrogen mineralization tendency,and a cooperativity between net N mineralization rate and plant growth rate was also found,however the soil nitrogen supplying capacity declined annually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1156 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net N mineralization rate and plant growth rate showed a cooperativity under zero nitrogen fertilization in spring maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZNFe3
Outcome
plant growth ratee3
Qualifier
cooperativity between net N mineralization rate and plant growth ratee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“ZNF presented a strong net nitrogen mineralization tendency,and a cooperativity between net N mineralization rate and plant growth rate was also found,however the soil nitrogen supplying capacity declined annually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under zero nitrogen fertilization, the soil nitrogen supplying capacity declined annually.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZNFe3
Outcome
soil nitrogen supplying capacitye3
Direction
declinede3
Qualifier
annuallye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“ZNF presented a strong net nitrogen mineralization tendency,and a cooperativity between net N mineralization rate and plant growth rate was also found,however the soil nitrogen supplying capacity declined annually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under recommended nitrogen fertilization, soil NO3-N content in the 0-90 cm layer was controlled at 90-220 kg/hm2.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RNFe4
Outcome
NO_3~--N content in 0-90 cm soil levele4
Value
90~220 kg/hm~2e4
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
e4

“In RNF,NO_3~--N content in 0-90 cm soil level was controlled in the range of 90~220 kg/hm~2,that not only ensured plants uptake normally,but also decreased N-leaching loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen fertilization decreased N-leaching loss compared with the other managements in spring maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RNFe4
Outcome
N-leaching losse4
Direction
decreasede4
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
e4

“In RNF,NO_3~--N content in 0-90 cm soil level was controlled in the range of 90~220 kg/hm~2,that not only ensured plants uptake normally,but also decreased N-leaching loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1328 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen fertilization ensured normal plant nitrogen uptake in spring maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RNFe4
Outcome
plants uptakee4
Qualifier
normallye4
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
e4

“In RNF,NO_3~--N content in 0-90 cm soil level was controlled in the range of 90~220 kg/hm~2,that not only ensured plants uptake normally,but also decreased N-leaching loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen fertilization saved 475 kg/km2 of nitrogen fertilizer over the three years in spring maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RNFe5
Outcome
nitrogen fertilizere5
Direction
savede5
Value
475 kg/km~2e5
Qualifier
In the three yearse5
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the three years, RNF saved 475 kg/km~2 nitrogen fertilizer totally, and improved nitrogen use efficiency 14%”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1329–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen fertilization improved nitrogen use efficiency by 14% in spring maize over three years.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RNFe5
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye5
Direction
improvede5
Value
14%e5
Qualifier
In the three yearse5
Setting
Dongbeiwang experimental statione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Dongbeiwang experimental station”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–700 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the three years, RNF saved 475 kg/km~2 nitrogen fertilizer totally, and improved nitrogen use efficiency 14%”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1329–1438 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.