Abstract
Field trials were conducted to study the influence of different fertilization models on sugarcane yield and profit. Results displayed that sugarcane height、weight per stem、yield and production profit were significantly increased as more fertilization times. Basal-application and top-dressing three times、basal-application and top-dressing twice、basal-application and top-dressing one time, improved single stem weight and production respectively by 9.6% 、6.8% and 4.5%,15.7% 、12.5% and 10.1%, in comparison to single basal-application; Therefore increased production profit respectively by 298、250、227 RMB/667 m2. These implied that Basal-application and top-dressing three times or basal-application and top-dressing should be the suitable fertilization models for sugarcane production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
More fertilization times significantly increased sugarcane height, stem weight, yield and profit.
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane height、weight per stem、yield and production profit were significantly increased as more fertilization times”
Claim · model-written summary
Three top dressings improved single stem weight by 9.6% relative to basal application alone.
Verbatim
e0“Basal-application and top-dressing three times、basal-application and top-dressing twice、basal-application and top-dressing one time, improved single stem weight and production respectively by 9.6% 、6.8% and 4.5%,15.7% 、12.5% and 10.1%, in comparison to single basal-application”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Two top dressings improved single stem weight by 6.8%.
Verbatim
e0“Basal-application and top-dressing three times、basal-application and top-dressing twice、basal-application and top-dressing one time, improved single stem weight and production respectively by 9.6% 、6.8% and 4.5%,15.7% 、12.5% and 10.1%, in comparison to single basal-application”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
One top dressing improved single stem weight by 4.5%.
Verbatim
e0“Basal-application and top-dressing three times、basal-application and top-dressing twice、basal-application and top-dressing one time, improved single stem weight and production respectively by 9.6% 、6.8% and 4.5%,15.7% 、12.5% and 10.1%, in comparison to single basal-application”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Three top dressings improved production by 15.7%.
Verbatim
e0“Basal-application and top-dressing three times、basal-application and top-dressing twice、basal-application and top-dressing one time, improved single stem weight and production respectively by 9.6% 、6.8% and 4.5%,15.7% 、12.5% and 10.1%, in comparison to single basal-application”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Two top dressings improved production by 12.5%.
Verbatim
e0“Basal-application and top-dressing three times、basal-application and top-dressing twice、basal-application and top-dressing one time, improved single stem weight and production respectively by 9.6% 、6.8% and 4.5%,15.7% 、12.5% and 10.1%, in comparison to single basal-application”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
One top dressing improved production by 10.1%.
Verbatim
e0“Basal-application and top-dressing three times、basal-application and top-dressing twice、basal-application and top-dressing one time, improved single stem weight and production respectively by 9.6% 、6.8% and 4.5%,15.7% 、12.5% and 10.1%, in comparison to single basal-application”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Three top dressings raised production profit by 298 RMB/667 m2.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“Therefore increased production profit respectively by 298、250、227 RMB/667 m2”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Two top dressings raised production profit by 250 RMB/667 m2.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“Therefore increased production profit respectively by 298、250、227 RMB/667 m2”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
One top dressing raised production profit by 227 RMB/667 m2.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“Therefore increased production profit respectively by 298、250、227 RMB/667 m2”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend basal application plus top dressing three times or top dressing for sugarcane production.
Verbatim
e0“Basal-application and top-dressing three times or basal-application and top-dressing should be the suitable fertilization models for sugarcane production”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.