Paper · 2013 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effects of Long-term Fertilizations on Maize Biomass and its Nutrient Uptake in Red Soil

Ping Xie

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the effects of different fertilizations on maize biomass,its nutrient uptake,and their relationship with soil nutrients,a long-term fertilization experiment was established in 1986 in red soil,Jinxian,Jiangxi province.The results were obtained as following:(1)Long-term application of chemical fertilizer decreased soil pH,whereas the chemical fertilizers combined with organic manure relieved soil acidification and increased SOC and available nutrient contents significantly.(2)Compared with CK treatment,application of N fertilizer alone reduced the amount of maize kernel,cob,straw and root,and balanced fertilization(NPK,2NPK) and organic fertilizer increased them by 1.1~2.9 times.The maize biomass was positively correlated with the soil pH,SOC,N and P significantly.(3)The distribution of N in maize was mainly in kernel and straw,accounting for 41.8%~61.3% and 30.3%~48.4% of total N in crop,respectively.P content was the highest in kernel(61.8%~73.9% of total P in crop),and K content was the highest in straw(accounting for 51.4%~67.9%).It was concluded that the combination of chemical and organic fertilizers promoted nutrient uptake as well as maize yield.The order of harvest index was P N K.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer decreased soil pH.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term application of chemical fertilizer decreased soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding manure to chemical fertilizer relieved soil acidification and significantly increased SOC and available nutrients.

Treatment
chemical fertilizers combined with organic manuree0
Outcome
soil acidification and increased SOC and available nutrient contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“chemical fertilizers combined with organic manure relieved soil acidification and increased SOC and available nutrient contents significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer alone reduced maize kernel, cob, straw and root amounts relative to CK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of N fertilizer alonee0
Outcome
amount of maize kernel,cob,straw and roote0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
CK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK treatment,application of N fertilizer alone reduced the amount of maize kernel,cob,straw and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced fertilization increased maize biomass components 1.1 to 2.9 times relative to CK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
balanced fertilization(NPK,2NPK)e0
Outcome
kernel,cob,straw and roote1
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.1~2.9 timese0
Comparator
CK treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“balanced fertilization(NPK,2NPK) and organic fertilizer increased them by 1.1~2.9 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with CK treatment,application of N fertilizer alone reduced the amount of maize kernel,cob,straw and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased maize biomass components 1.1 to 2.9 times relative to CK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
kernel,cob,straw and roote1
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.1~2.9 timese0
Comparator
CK treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilizer increased them by 1.1~2.9 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with CK treatment,application of N fertilizer alone reduced the amount of maize kernel,cob,straw and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–612 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize biomass correlated positively and significantly with soil pH, SOC, N and P.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
N and Pe0
Outcome
maize biomasse0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maize biomass was positively correlated with the soil pH,SOC,N and P significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–792 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize nitrogen was mainly in kernels, at 41.8% to 61.3% of total crop N.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
kernele0
Outcome
distribution of Ne0
Value
41.8%~61.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution of N in maize was mainly in kernel and straw,accounting for 41.8%~61.3% and 30.3%~48.4% of total N in crop,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–932 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize nitrogen in straw accounted for 30.3% to 48.4% of total crop N.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Outcome
distribution of Ne0
Value
30.3%~48.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution of N in maize was mainly in kernel and straw,accounting for 41.8%~61.3% and 30.3%~48.4% of total N in crop,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–932 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel phosphorus was highest, at 61.8% to 73.9% of total crop P.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
kernele0
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
61.8%~73.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P content was the highest in kernel(61.8%~73.9% of total P in crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“The distribution of N in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium content was highest in straw, accounting for 51.4% to 67.9%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
strawe0
Outcome
K contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
51.4%~67.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K content was the highest in straw(accounting for 51.4%~67.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“The distribution of N in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined chemical and organic fertilizers promoted nutrient uptake and maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
combination of chemical and organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
nutrient uptake as well as maize yielde0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of chemical and organic fertilizers promoted nutrient uptake as well as maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1188 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 46 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 303 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.