Paper · 2001 · Anhui Nongye Daxue xuebao

Risk assessment of bar gene transfer from B and D genomes of transformed wheat (Triticum aestivum) lines to jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica)

Yi Lin

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The risk assessment of Bar gene transfer from B and D genomes of transformed wheat lines to jointed goatgrass was done by investigating the seed set of hybrids of crosses and back crossess.Transformed Bobwhite 31 line with Bar gene in B genome,71 line with Bar gene in D genome and jointed goatgrass served as the parents.Three ways of pollination,including non emasculation and spontaneous pollination,emasculation and spontaneous pollination,and emasculation and artificial pollination were adopted in order to verify the effects to bar gene transfer under the different pollination conditions.By testing the ratio of resistant plants in backcross population the safety assessment to Bar gene locating on B genome and on D genome was done.The results showed that the seed set was very poor using the way of non emasculation and spontaneous pollination,actually no seed was obtained in this experiment,however,the hybrids were available under the condition of artificial pollination.As to Bar gene transfer there was significant difference between the gene loci in B genome and in D genome.The former was more difficult to be transferred from transformed wheat to jointed goatgrass than the later,because wheat consists of AABBDD genomes and jointed goatgrass is CCDD genomes,which share a common D genome,so the chromosomes of D genome will not become univalent and be lost in forming gamete.In this experiment,a higher ratio of resistant plants was found in population of (71 line×jointed goatgrass)×jointed goatgrass,and no resistant plants existed in the population of (31 line×jointed goatgrass)×jointed goatgrass.Therefore the transformed wheat with Bar gene in B or A genome can be used to control grass in order to mitigate the risk of gene transfer from transformed wheat to jointed goatgrass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-emasculated spontaneous pollination produced no hybrid seed.

Treatment
non emasculation and spontaneous pollinatione0
Outcome
seed sete0
Direction
very poore0
Comparator
artificial pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed set was very poor using the way of non emasculation and spontaneous pollination,actually no seed was obtained in this experiment,however,the hybrids were available under the condition of artificial pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial pollination yielded hybrids.

Treatment
artificial pollinatione0
Outcome
hybrids were availablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the hybrids were available under the condition of artificial pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bar gene transfer differed significantly by genome location, with B harder to transfer than D.

Gene
Bar genee1
Outcome
transferred from transformed wheat to jointed goatgrasse0
Direction
more difficulte0
Comparator
D genomee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant difference between the gene loci in B genome and in D genome.The former was more difficult to be transferred from transformed wheat to jointed goatgrass than the later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1197 · show in text ↑
e1

“transformed wheat with Bar gene in B or A genome can be used to control grass in order to mitigate the risk of gene transfer from transformed wheat to jointed goatgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D genome cross yielded a higher ratio of resistant plants.

Material
71 linee0
Interactor
jointed goatgrasse0weed
Outcome
ratio of resistant plantse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher ratio of resistant plants was found in population of (71 line×jointed goatgrass)×jointed goatgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B genome cross yielded no resistant plants.

Material
31 linee0
Interactor
jointed goatgrasse0weed
Outcome
resistant plantse0
Direction
noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no resistant plants existed in the population of (31 line×jointed goatgrass)×jointed goatgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend transformed wheat carrying Bar in the B or A genome to control grass while mitigating gene transfer.

Interactor
jointed goatgrasse0weed
Gene
Bar genee0
Outcome
control grass in order to mitigate the risk of gene transfere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transformed wheat with Bar gene in B or A genome can be used to control grass in order to mitigate the risk of gene transfer from transformed wheat to jointed goatgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1802 · show in text ↑

pollination · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.