Paper · 2006

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Nitrogen Assimilation and the Cumulative Fraction of Dry Matter Yield in Different Genotypes Winter Wheat

WU Wei-mo; Shiqing Li

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Eight winter wheat genotypes,NR9405,9430,Yanshi 9,Xiaoyan No.6,San 229,Xinong 2208,Aifeng 3 and Sang 188,were used as indication crops to study the effects of genotypes and nitrogen fertilizer application rate(0,90Nkg/hm~2) on the wheat nitrogen assimilation,the cumulative fraction of dry matter,yield and yield components.The results showed that there were significant differences of genotypes on the nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachis,grain at maturity,nitrogen harvest index(NHI),the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leaves,stems,grains,which were not significantly effected by nitrogen application rate.There were significant differences of genotypes on the total nitrogen assimilation(NTA),grain yield,the number of ears per unit area,the number of tillers per plant,kernels per spike,kernels of unit area,1000 kernels weight,grain mass per ears.The consequence of wheat yield increasing was that nitrogen application increased the plants per unit area,spikes per unit area,the number of tillers per plant,kernels of unit area and grains of unit area.Meanwhile,nitrogen application improved the dry matter accumulation as well as the total nitrogen assimilation,but it did not increase the grain nitrogen content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in nitrogen concentration of leaves, stems, hull and rachis.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences of genotypes on the nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachis,grain at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in grain nitrogen concentration at maturity, nitrogen harvest index and dry matter allocation to leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
grain at maturity,nitrogen harvest index(NHI),the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences of genotypes on the nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachis,grain at maturity,nitrogen harvest index(NHI),the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leaves,stems,grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–578 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in dry matter allocation to stems and grains.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
genotypese0
Organ / stage
stems,grainse0
Outcome
the cumulative fraction of dry mattere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences of genotypes on the nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachis,grain at maturity,nitrogen harvest index(NHI),the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leaves,stems,grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–578 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application did not significantly affect nitrogen concentrations in leaves, stems, hull and rachis.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
nitrogen application ratee0
Outcome
nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachise0
Direction
not significantly effectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachis,grain at maturity,nitrogen harvest index(NHI),the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leaves,stems,grains,which were not significantly effected by nitrogen application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application did not significantly affect grain nitrogen concentration at maturity, nitrogen harvest index or dry matter allocation to leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
nitrogen application ratee0
Outcome
grain at maturity,nitrogen harvest index(NHI),the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leavese0
Direction
not significantly effectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen concentration of leaves,stems,hull and rachis,grain at maturity,nitrogen harvest index(NHI),the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leaves,stems,grains,which were not significantly effected by nitrogen application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application did not significantly affect dry matter allocation to stems and grains.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
stems,grainse0
Treatment
nitrogen application ratee0
Outcome
the cumulative fraction of dry mattere0
Direction
not significantly effectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cumulative fraction of dry matter allocated to the leaves,stems,grains,which were not significantly effected by nitrogen application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in total nitrogen assimilation, grain yield and ears per unit area.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
total nitrogen assimilation(NTA),grain yield,the number of ears per unit areae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences of genotypes on the total nitrogen assimilation(NTA),grain yield,the number of ears per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in tillers per plant, kernels per spike and kernels per unit area.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
the number of tillers per plant,kernels per spike,kernels of unit areae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences of genotypes on the total nitrogen assimilation(NTA),grain yield,the number of ears per unit area,the number of tillers per plant,kernels per spike,kernels of unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–849 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in thousand-kernel weight and grain mass per ear.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
1000 kernels weight,grain mass per earse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences of genotypes on the total nitrogen assimilation(NTA),grain yield,the number of ears per unit area,the number of tillers per plant,kernels per spike,kernels of unit area,1000 kernels weight,grain mass per ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased plants per unit area, spikes per unit area and tillers per plant.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
plants per unit area,spikes per unit area,the number of tillers per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen application increased the plants per unit area,spikes per unit area,the number of tillers per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased kernels and grains per unit area.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
kernels of unit area and grains of unit areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen application increased the plants per unit area,spikes per unit area,the number of tillers per plant,kernels of unit area and grains of unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1094 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application improved dry matter accumulation and total nitrogen assimilation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation as well as the total nitrogen assimilatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen application improved the dry matter accumulation as well as the total nitrogen assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1205 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application did not increase grain nitrogen content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
grain nitrogen contente0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen application improved the dry matter accumulation as well as the total nitrogen assimilation,but it did not increase the grain nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight winter wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors link increasing wheat yield to nitrogen-induced increases in plant and grain numbers per unit area.

Treatment
nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
increased the plants per unit area,spikes per unit area,the number of tillers per plant,kernels of unit area and grains of unit areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The consequence of wheat yield increasing was that nitrogen application increased the plants per unit area,spikes per unit area,the number of tillers per plant,kernels of unit area and grains of unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1094 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 410 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 426 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.