Paper · 2019 · Scientific Reports

Growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake in wheat are affected by differences in nitrogen levels and forms and potassium supply

Jiuxin Guo; Yamin Jia; Huanhuan Chen; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
187
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) are essential macronutrients for plants growth; however, the mechanism by which K mediates negative effects on ammonium-sensitive plants is still poorly understood. We hypothesized that K supplies may enhance antagonistic ammonium stress while improving nitrate nutrition function, which wheat seedlings were grown in sand culture in the presence of two N forms (ammonium; nitrate) supplied at two rates (2, 10 mmol L −1 ) and three K levels (0.5, 5, 15 mmol L −1 ). We found that a high N rate increased plant biomass under nitrate nutrition, while it had a negative effect under ammonium nutrition. Compared with nitrate, biomass was depressed by 54% or 85% for low or high N rate under ammonium. This resulted in a reduction in gas exchange parameters and a subsequent decrease in growth variables and nutrient uptake, whereas these parameters increased significantly with increasing K levels. Moreover, in principal components analysis, these variations were highly clustered under nitrate nutrition and highly separated under ammonium nutrition. Our study shows a clear positive interaction between K and N, suggesting that high K supply relieves ammonium stress while improving growth vigor under nitrate nutrition by enhancing nutrient uptake and assimilate production in wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen increased wheat biomass with nitrate nutrition.

Treatment
a high N ratee0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under nitrate nutritione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a high N rate increased plant biomass under nitrate nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen had a negative effect on wheat biomass with ammonium nutrition.

Treatment
a high N ratee0
Outcome
negative effecte0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
under ammonium nutritione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a high N rate increased plant biomass under nitrate nutrition, while it had a negative effect under ammonium nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low nitrogen, ammonium depressed wheat biomass by 54% versus nitrate.

Treatment
ammoniume0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
depressede0
Value
54%e0
Qualifier
low or high N ratee0
Comparator
nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with nitrate, biomass was depressed by 54% or 85% for low or high N rate under ammonium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high nitrogen, ammonium depressed wheat biomass by 85% versus nitrate.

Treatment
ammoniume0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
depressede0
Value
85%e0
Comparator
nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with nitrate, biomass was depressed by 54% or 85% for low or high N rate under ammonium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition reduced wheat gas exchange parameters, growth variables, and nutrient uptake.

Outcome
gas exchange parameters and a subsequent decrease in growth variables and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a reduction in gas exchange parameters and a subsequent decrease in growth variables and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium significantly increased these wheat parameters.

Treatment
increasing K levelse0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these parameters increased significantly with increasing K levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal components variations clustered under nitrate nutrition and separated under ammonium nutrition.

Outcome
these variationse0
Qualifier
under nitrate nutrition and highly separated under ammonium nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these variations were highly clustered under nitrate nutrition and highly separated under ammonium nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.