Paper · 2001 · Xi'nan Nongye Daxue xuebao

STUDY OF FERTILIZER EFFICIENCY IN MULCHED TOMATO PLANTING

Liao Tie-jun

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A comparative study was made of mulched and unprotected planting of tomato on a neutral purple soil. With adequate P and K as basal fertilizer, plant height, fruit weight, the contents of N, P and K of the plants and their fruit yield increased with N rate. However, excessive N application resulted in yield decrease. With similar fertilizer rates, mulching treatment gave 11.19%~23.29% greater plant height and 3.26%~19.01% higher yield than the unprotected cultivation treatment. Thus mulching significantly improved fertilizer efficiency. Different fertilizer combinations had little influence on the total content of soluble solids, while sugar content of the fruit was considerably influenced by nutrient supply. N combined with P and K promoted, to some extent, the quality of the fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate phosphorus and potassium, increasing nitrogen increased tomato plant height, fruit weight, nutrient contents and yield.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
plant height, fruit weight, the contents of N, P and K of the plants and their fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
With adequate P and K as basal fertilizere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With adequate P and K as basal fertilizer, plant height, fruit weight, the contents of N, P and K of the plants and their fruit yield increased with N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen reduced tomato yield.

Treatment
excessive N applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive N application resulted in yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased tomato plant height by 11.19%~23.29% over unprotected cultivation.

Treatment
mulching treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
11.19%~23.29%e0
Comparator
unprotected cultivation treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching treatment gave 11.19%~23.29% greater plant height and 3.26%~19.01% higher yield than the unprotected cultivation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased tomato yield by 3.26%~19.01% over unprotected cultivation.

Treatment
mulching treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.26%~19.01%e0
Comparator
unprotected cultivation treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching treatment gave 11.19%~23.29% greater plant height and 3.26%~19.01% higher yield than the unprotected cultivation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching significantly improved fertilizer efficiency.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
fertilizer efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching significantly improved fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer combinations had little influence on tomato soluble solids.

Treatment
Different fertilizer combinationse0
Outcome
total content of soluble solidse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different fertilizer combinations had little influence on the total content of soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient supply considerably influenced tomato fruit sugar content.

Treatment
nutrient supplye0
Outcome
sugar content of the fruite0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content of the fruit was considerably influenced by nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen with phosphorus and potassium promoted tomato fruit quality to some extent.

Treatment
N combined with P and Ke0
Outcome
quality of the fruite0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
to some extente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N combined with P and K promoted, to some extent, the quality of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO PLANTING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑

mulching · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 172 positive, 38 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

mulching · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.