Paper · 2015 · Jilin Agricultural Sciences

Control Efficacy of Cucumber Powdery Mildew with Microbial Source Fungicide

Sun Hu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to explore the prevention and cure function of microbial source fungicide to cucumber pow-dery mildew, chemicals and water treatment were used as control, a preparation of chitinase microbial sources asmain component was made to prevent and control cucumber powdery mildew. Incidence of powdery mildew of cu-cumber, root activity, and a series of biological properties and quality were determined. Through a microscope, itwas found that the preparation could inhibit fungus reproduction by destruction of powdery mildew pathogen sporescell walls. The plant test showed that incidence of powdery mildew was 8.77% in microbial preparation treatment.The control effect was 89.32%, which was far higher than controls. The yield increased by 15.7%. Quality indexsuch as total amino acid content and root vigor were significantly higher than the control. The research showed thatthe preparation could effectively reduce the incidence of powdery mildew of cucumber and promote plant growth atthe same time. The preparation has potential application value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparation inhibited fungal reproduction by destroying pathogen spore walls.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
preparatione0
Interactor
powdery mildew pathogene0pathogen
Outcome
fungus reproductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the preparation could inhibit fungus reproduction by destruction of powdery mildew pathogen sporescell walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Powdery Mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew incidence in treated cucumber was 8.77%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
microbial preparation treatmente0
Outcome
incidence of powdery mildewe0
Value
8.77%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence of powdery mildew was 8.77% in microbial preparation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Powdery Mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparation achieved 89.32% control effect, far higher than controls.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Microbial Source Fungicidet0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
far highere0
Value
89.32%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control effect was 89.32%, which was far higher than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control Efficacy of Cucumber Powdery Mildew with Microbial Source Fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield increased by 15.7%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Microbial Source Fungicidet0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increased by 15.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control Efficacy of Cucumber Powdery Mildew with Microbial Source Fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total amino acid content and root vigor were significantly higher than control.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Microbial Source Fungicidet0
Outcome
total amino acid content and root vigore0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quality indexsuch as total amino acid content and root vigor were significantly higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control Efficacy of Cucumber Powdery Mildew with Microbial Source Fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fungicide · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · control · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.