Paper · 2012 · Guangdong nongye kexue

Effect of the application of Puma before and after jointing on photosynthetic physiologies in the leaves of wheat

Wang Xin

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Wheat is one of main grain crop,the harm of weeds on wheat production development is one of the important factors.Trial used a randomized block design,before and after applying in wheat jointing 5 concentrations of herbicide Puma(25,50,100,150,300 g per 667 m2) after spraying,determination of wheat leaf net photosynthetic rate(Pn),stomatal conductance(Gs),intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci),transpiration rate(Tr) indicators,designed for safety application of herbicides in wheat field to provide the theory basis and the technical support.The results showed that: before spraying after jointing,Puma,in wheat flag leaf stage pour two leaf transpiration rate with spray dose increased decreased,while heading stage and grain filling period is decreased with rising trend.In flagging stage,fall two leaf water use efficiency rise,heading stage and then decreased,while in the period of grain filling,pour two leaf water use efficiency decreased,as the Puma concentration increases and wheat growth period after pushing two,the wheat leaf water use efficiency was reduced gradually,and after jointing stage spraying water use efficiency was significantly lower jointing the front spraying.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before jointing, greater Puma dose reduced transpiration of the second leaf below the flag leaf at flag-leaf stage.

Organ / stage
flag leaf stage pour two leafe0
Treatment
Pumae1
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat flag leaf stage pour two leaf transpiration rate with spray dose increased decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“while in the period of grain filling,pour two leaf water use efficiency decreased,as the Puma concentration increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–982 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At heading and grain filling, transpiration decreased and then rose as spray dose increased.

Organ / stage
heading stage and grain filling periode0
Treatment
Pumae1
Outcome
transpiration ratee2
Direction
decreased with rising trende0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“while heading stage and grain filling period is decreased with rising trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“while in the period of grain filling,pour two leaf water use efficiency decreased,as the Puma concentration increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–982 · show in text ↑
e2

“in wheat flag leaf stage pour two leaf transpiration rate with spray dose increased decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–697 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency of the second leaf below the flag leaf rose at flagging and then fell at heading.

Organ / stage
fall two leafe0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
risee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“In flagging stage,fall two leaf water use efficiency rise,heading stage and then decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–864 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At grain filling, second-leaf water use efficiency fell as Puma concentration increased.

Organ / stage
pour two leafe0
Treatment
Pumae0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“while in the period of grain filling,pour two leaf water use efficiency decreased,as the Puma concentration increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency declined as wheat growth progressed.

Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
reduced graduallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as the Puma concentration increases and wheat growth period after pushing two,the wheat leaf water use efficiency was reduced gradually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying after jointing yielded significantly lower water use efficiency than spraying before jointing.

Treatment
after jointing stage sprayinge0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
jointing the front sprayinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“after jointing stage spraying water use efficiency was significantly lower jointing the front spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1189 · show in text ↑

application · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.