Paper · 2005 · Xibei nongye xuebao

The Effect of Walnut Peel′s Extracts on Seedling Growth of Some Crops

Zhang Feng-yun; Mao Fuchun

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It was studied that the allelopathic effect of walnut peel`s water and ethanol extract on some economic crop such as wheat, green bean, cucumber and radish by biological appraisal. The results indicated that the two abstracted solution from walnut peel had inhibitive effect on the seed germination, sprouts growth and root length of provided crops. The more concentration of extract, the stronger of inhibiting the seed germination; the inhibited effect of solution extracted by water is stronger than the solution extracted by ethanol. The results showed that the extracts has also promotive effect to some extent on the seed germination when it is diluted to certain range.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Walnut peel water and ethanol extracts inhibited germination, sprout growth and root length of the tested crops.

Taxon
wheat, green bean, cucumber and radishe1
Treatment
two abstracted solution from walnut peele0
Outcome
seed germination, sprouts growth and root lengthe0
Direction
inhibitivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the two abstracted solution from walnut peel had inhibitive effect on the seed germination, sprouts growth and root length of provided crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–349 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, green bean, cucumber and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher extract concentration caused stronger inhibition of crop seed germination.

Taxon
wheat, green bean, cucumber and radishe1
Treatment
concentration of extracte0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
stronger of inhibitinge0

Verbatim

e0

“The more concentration of extract, the stronger of inhibiting the seed germination;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, green bean, cucumber and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extract inhibited crop seed germination more strongly than ethanol extract.

Taxon
wheat, green bean, cucumber and radishe2
Treatment
solution extracted by watere0
Outcome
seed germinatione1
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
solution extracted by ethanole0

Verbatim

e0

“the inhibited effect of solution extracted by water is stronger than the solution extracted by ethanol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–537 · show in text ↑
e1

“the stronger of inhibiting the seed germination;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–433 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat, green bean, cucumber and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At some dilutions, walnut peel extracts promoted crop seed germination.

Taxon
wheat, green bean, cucumber and radishe1
Treatment
the extractse0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
promotivee0
Qualifier
diluted to certain rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the extracts has also promotive effect to some extent on the seed germination when it is diluted to certain range.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, green bean, cucumber and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 50 positive, 38 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

botanical · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 66 positive, 45 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

botanical · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 53 positive, 99 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 99 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.