Paper · 1977 · Physiologia Plantarum

Rooting Substances in Water Extracts of Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis

M. D. V. GESTO; A. VÁZQUEZ; E. VIEITEZ

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The rooting activity of water extracts of cuttings of chestnut ( Castanea sativa Mill.) and willow ( Salix viminalis L.) was studied throughout the year by the bean rooting test. The chestnut extract nullified the rooting activity of 10 −5 M IAA, but on the whole it did not modify the rooting pattern of the bean cuttings. The willow extract increased rooting and showed a rhythm in the content of endogenous growth substances. IAA was found at the time when the extract showed the strongest rooting activity. The extract from willow contained two synergistic root‐promoting fractions with the R f 's of 0.0–0.2 and 0.6–0.8 in isopropanol: ammonia: water. The latter one promoted rooting without added IAA. In this fraction a high amount of catechol was detected. No clear correlation was found between the ability to induce roots and the total phenol content in the two species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chestnut extract nullified IAA rooting activity in bean cuttings.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
chestnut extracte0
Outcome
rooting activitye0
Direction
nullifiede0
Comparator
10 −5 M IAAe0

Verbatim

e0

“The chestnut extract nullified the rooting activity of 10 −5 M IAA, but on the whole it did not modify the rooting pattern of the bean cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chestnut extract generally did not modify the rooting pattern of bean cuttings.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
chestnut extracte0
Outcome
rooting patterne0
Direction
did not modifye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The chestnut extract nullified the rooting activity of 10 −5 M IAA, but on the whole it did not modify the rooting pattern of the bean cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Willow extract increased rooting.

Taxon
Salix viminalisSalix viminalist0
Treatment
willow extracte0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The willow extract increased rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Willow extract showed a rhythm in endogenous growth substance content.

Taxon
Salix viminalisSalix viminalist0
Outcome
rhythm in the content of endogenous growth substancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The willow extract increased rooting and showed a rhythm in the content of endogenous growth substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA was present when extract rooting activity was strongest.

Taxon
Salix viminalisSalix viminalist0
Treatment
extracte0
Outcome
IAA was founde0
Qualifier
strongest rooting activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA was found at the time when the extract showed the strongest rooting activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Willow extract contained two synergistic root promoting fractions.

Taxon
Salix viminalisSalix viminalist0
Outcome
two synergistic root‐promoting fractionse0
Value
0.0–0.2 and 0.6–0.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract from willow contained two synergistic root‐promoting fractions with the R f 's of 0.0–0.2 and 0.6–0.8 in isopropanol: ammonia: water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The latter willow fraction promoted rooting without added IAA.

Taxon
Salix viminalisSalix viminalist0
Treatment
latter onee0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
without added IAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The latter one promoted rooting without added IAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high amount of catechol was detected in the latter willow fraction.

Taxon
Salix viminalisSalix viminalist0
Outcome
high amount of catechole0
Qualifier
this fractione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this fraction a high amount of catechol was detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root induction ability and total phenol content showed no clear correlation.

Taxon
Castanea sativa and Salix viminalisCastanea sativaSalix viminalist0
Compound
total phenole0
Outcome
ability to induce rootse0
Direction
No clear correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Castanea sativa
Castanea sativa · TaxonMiguel Angel Masegosa Martínez · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No clear correlation was found between the ability to induce roots and the total phenol content in the two species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Castanea sativa and Salix viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 50 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.