Paper · 2012 · Phosphate and Compound Fertilizer

The effect of dressing controlled release fertilizer on sugarcane yield and benefit in difference growth period

Tan HongWei

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the contrast of the sugarcane conventional fertilization(base fertilizer,tillering fertilizer,elongation fertilizer)period,reducing fertilization times of 1-2,the equal fertilization amount,the test results of the two different location show:in tillering to elongation period dressing one-time controlled release fertilizer can keep a certain amount of productive tiller,which is also beneficial to elongation and improving diameter,high sugarcane yield,low labor cost,and worthy to be applied and popularized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-time dressing of controlled release fertilizer in the tillering to elongation period can keep a certain amount of productive tillers in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
dressing one-time controlled release fertilizere1
Outcome
productive tillere1
Direction
keepe1
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the contrast of the sugarcane conventional fertilization(base fertilizer,tillering fertilizer,elongation fertilizer)period,reducing fertilization times of 1-2,the equal fertilization amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“dressing one-time controlled release fertilizer can keep a certain amount of productive tiller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-time dressing of controlled release fertilizer was beneficial to sugarcane elongation and stalk diameter.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
dressing one-time controlled release fertilizere1
Outcome
elongation and improving diametere2
Direction
beneficial toe2
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the contrast of the sugarcane conventional fertilization(base fertilizer,tillering fertilizer,elongation fertilizer)period,reducing fertilization times of 1-2,the equal fertilization amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“dressing one-time controlled release fertilizer can keep a certain amount of productive tiller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–379 · show in text ↑
e2

“which is also beneficial to elongation and improving diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-time dressing of controlled release fertilizer gave high sugarcane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
dressing one-time controlled release fertilizere1
Outcome
sugarcane yielde3
Direction
highe3
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the contrast of the sugarcane conventional fertilization(base fertilizer,tillering fertilizer,elongation fertilizer)period,reducing fertilization times of 1-2,the equal fertilization amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“dressing one-time controlled release fertilizer can keep a certain amount of productive tiller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–379 · show in text ↑
e3

“high sugarcane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-time dressing of controlled release fertilizer gave low labor cost in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
dressing one-time controlled release fertilizere1
Outcome
labor coste4
Direction
lowe4
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the contrast of the sugarcane conventional fertilization(base fertilizer,tillering fertilizer,elongation fertilizer)period,reducing fertilization times of 1-2,the equal fertilization amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“dressing one-time controlled release fertilizer can keep a certain amount of productive tiller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–379 · show in text ↑
e4

“low labor cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–477 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The one-time controlled release fertilizer dressing is worthy to be applied and popularized in sugarcane production.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
applied and popularizede5

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the contrast of the sugarcane conventional fertilization(base fertilizer,tillering fertilizer,elongation fertilizer)period,reducing fertilization times of 1-2,the equal fertilization amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198 · show in text ↑
e5

“worthy to be applied and popularized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–518 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.