Paper · 2006 · Shenyang Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effect of Different Kinds of Manure on Soil Fertility and Qulity and Yield of Tomato in Solar-greenhouse

Zhang Fu-man

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three kinels of manur were as the base-fertiliers wsed in Beijing's suburb,The results showed that the soil chronically treated by straw organic fertilizer had good physical and chemic properties,the fertility in soil was higher.Its organic matter content was 32.0g.kg-1,which was the highest among three treatments in three treatments.The processed chicken fertilizer often used in the production to make the soil's acidity more strong.The soil nutrient content was in the middle of three base-fertilizers in this experiment.As The tomato fruit's nutrition contents Vc,soluble solid matters,soluble sugar,free amino-acid and the ratio of sugar to acid were respectively 13.60μg.g-1,54.4mg.g-1,37.6mg.g-1,62.22μg.g-1 and 9.68,which were significantly higher than the other base-fatties.The correlation between soil nutrition and tomato fruit quality,yield was analyzed in the experiment.The results indicated that the indices of tomato's quality were significantly related to soil organic matter,available phosphorus,total nitrogen and available potassium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw organic fertilizer improved soil physical and chemical properties and fertility.

Treatment
straw organic fertilizere0
Outcome
physical and chemic properties,the fertility in soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil chronically treated by straw organic fertilizer had good physical and chemic properties,the fertility in soil was higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw organic fertilizer produced the highest soil organic matter content, 32.0g.kg-1.

Treatment
straw organic fertilizert1
Outcome
organic matter contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32.0g.kg-1e0
Comparator
three treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Its organic matter content was 32.0g.kg-1,which was the highest among three treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“straw organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Processed chicken fertilizer increased soil acidity.

Treatment
processed chicken fertilizere0
Outcome
soil's aciditye0
Direction
more stronge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The processed chicken fertilizer often used in the production to make the soil's acidity more strong”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Processed chicken fertilizer gave intermediate soil nutrient content among three base fertilizers.

Treatment
processed chicken fertilizert1
Outcome
soil nutrient contente0
Direction
in the middlee0
Comparator
three base-fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil nutrient content was in the middle of three base-fertilizers in this experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“processed chicken fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit Vc was 13.60μg.g-1 and significantly higher than with other base fertilizers.

Treatment
processed chicken fertilizert1
Outcome
Vce0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.60μg.g-1e0
Comparator
the other base-fattiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato fruit's nutrition contents Vc,soluble solid matters,soluble sugar,free amino-acid and the ratio of sugar to acid were respectively 13.60μg.g-1,54.4mg.g-1,37.6mg.g-1,62.22μg.g-1 and 9.68,which were significantly higher than the other base-fatties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“processed chicken fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit soluble solids were 54.4mg.g-1 and significantly higher than with other base fertilizers.

Treatment
processed chicken fertilizert1
Outcome
soluble solid matterse0
Direction
highere0
Value
54.4mg.g-1e0
Comparator
the other base-fattiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato fruit's nutrition contents Vc,soluble solid matters,soluble sugar,free amino-acid and the ratio of sugar to acid were respectively 13.60μg.g-1,54.4mg.g-1,37.6mg.g-1,62.22μg.g-1 and 9.68,which were significantly higher than the other base-fatties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“processed chicken fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit soluble sugar was 37.6mg.g-1 and significantly higher than with other base fertilizers.

Treatment
processed chicken fertilizert1
Outcome
soluble sugare0
Direction
highere0
Value
37.6mg.g-1e0
Comparator
the other base-fattiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato fruit's nutrition contents Vc,soluble solid matters,soluble sugar,free amino-acid and the ratio of sugar to acid were respectively 13.60μg.g-1,54.4mg.g-1,37.6mg.g-1,62.22μg.g-1 and 9.68,which were significantly higher than the other base-fatties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“processed chicken fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit free amino acid was 62.22μg.g-1 and significantly higher than with other base fertilizers.

Treatment
processed chicken fertilizert1
Outcome
free amino-acide0
Direction
highere0
Value
62.22μg.g-1e0
Comparator
the other base-fattiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato fruit's nutrition contents Vc,soluble solid matters,soluble sugar,free amino-acid and the ratio of sugar to acid were respectively 13.60μg.g-1,54.4mg.g-1,37.6mg.g-1,62.22μg.g-1 and 9.68,which were significantly higher than the other base-fatties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“processed chicken fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit sugar-to-acid ratio was 9.68 and significantly higher than with other base fertilizers.

Treatment
processed chicken fertilizert1
Outcome
ratio of sugar to acide0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.68e0
Comparator
the other base-fattiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato fruit's nutrition contents Vc,soluble solid matters,soluble sugar,free amino-acid and the ratio of sugar to acid were respectively 13.60μg.g-1,54.4mg.g-1,37.6mg.g-1,62.22μg.g-1 and 9.68,which were significantly higher than the other base-fatties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“processed chicken fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–368 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato quality indices were significantly related to soil organic matter, available phosphorus, total nitrogen and available potassium.

Compound
soil organic matter,available phosphorus,total nitrogen and available potassiume0
Outcome
indices of tomato's qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the indices of tomato's quality were significantly related to soil organic matter,available phosphorus,total nitrogen and available potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1055 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 48 positive, 1 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.