Paper · 2000 · Shandong Agricultural Sciences

Effect of sulfur on quality and yield of winter wheat

Pan Qingmin

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The canopy photosynthetic rate of winter wheat cultivars rose when the sulfur were applied on rich nitrogen but poor sulfur field It rose as sulfur increased for Lumai 22, but for Yannong 15, there was no difference between treatment S 3 and treatment S 2 When the sulfur was applied, the NR activity in flag leaf rose obviously, the content and the accumulating amount of nitrogen in two cultivars increased at each stage, and the kernel volume weight, the flour extraction, the protein content, the wet gluten content and the dough stability time for both cultivars were also lifted, with treatment S 2 highest among all treatments In addition, applying sulfur could increase yield of both cultivars For Lumai 22, applying sulfur could obviously increase the spikes, the kernels per spike and the 1000-kernel weight, with the yield of treatment S 3 highest For Yannong 15, applying sulfur could also increase the spikes and the kernels per spike, but had no significant effect on the 1000-kernel weight

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased canopy photosynthetic rate in winter wheat cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
canopy photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
rosee0
Setting
rich nitrogen but poor sulfur fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The canopy photosynthetic rate of winter wheat cultivars rose when the sulfur were applied on rich nitrogen but poor sulfur field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lumai 22 photosynthetic rate rose as sulfur increased.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Lumai 22e0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
rosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It rose as sulfur increased for Lumai 22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“The canopy photosynthetic rate of winter wheat cultivars rose when the sulfur were applied on rich nitrogen but poor sulfur field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yannong 15 photosynthetic rate did not differ between S3 and S2.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Yannong 15e0
Treatment
treatment S 3e0
Outcome
no differencee0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
treatment S 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for Yannong 15, there was no difference between treatment S 3 and treatment S 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–255 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased flag leaf NR activity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
NR activitye0
Direction
rosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the sulfur was applied, the NR activity in flag leaf rose obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–328 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased nitrogen content and accumulation in both cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
content and the accumulating amount of nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at each stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the sulfur was applied, the NR activity in flag leaf rose obviously, the content and the accumulating amount of nitrogen in two cultivars increased at each stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–422 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased kernel volume weight, flour extraction and protein content in both cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulfurt0
Outcome
kernel volume weight, the flour extraction, the protein contente0
Direction
liftede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the kernel volume weight, the flour extraction, the protein content, the wet gluten content and the dough stability time for both cultivars were also lifted, with treatment S 2 highest among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“sulfur on quality and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased wet gluten content and dough stability time in both cultivars, with S2 highest.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulfurt0
Outcome
wet gluten content and the dough stability timee0
Direction
liftede0
Qualifier
treatment S 2 highest among all treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the kernel volume weight, the flour extraction, the protein content, the wet gluten content and the dough stability time for both cultivars were also lifted, with treatment S 2 highest among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“sulfur on quality and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased yield in both cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying sulfur could increase yield of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased spikes, kernels per spike and 1000-kernel weight in Lumai 22.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Lumai 22e0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
spikes, the kernels per spike and the 1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Lumai 22, applying sulfur could obviously increase the spikes, the kernels per spike and the 1000-kernel weight, with the yield of treatment S 3 highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lumai 22 yield was highest under S3.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Lumai 22e0
Treatment
treatment S 3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Lumai 22, applying sulfur could obviously increase the spikes, the kernels per spike and the 1000-kernel weight, with the yield of treatment S 3 highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased spikes and kernels per spike in Yannong 15.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Yannong 15e0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
spikes and the kernels per spikee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Yannong 15, applying sulfur could also increase the spikes and the kernels per spike, but had no significant effect on the 1000-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur had no significant effect on 1000-kernel weight in Yannong 15.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Yannong 15e0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Yannong 15, applying sulfur could also increase the spikes and the kernels per spike, but had no significant effect on the 1000-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.