Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to study root characters and yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation and common cultivation taking the hybrid maize Guidan 8 as the material.The results showed that the root surface area,root length,volumn,number of root tips under no-tillage cultivation were all significantly lower than under common cultivation,but root diameter had no significant difference.Compared with tillage cultivation,ear leaf area and ear height were significantly lower under no-tillage cultivation,but plant height and stem diameter had no significant difference.And for yield component factors,bare stem rate,grain number and thousand kernel weight had no significant difference either.The per capita yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation was significantly lower than under tillage cultivation for its high lodging rate and fewer effective plant number.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage cultivation significantly reduced root surface area, root length and root volume of maize compared with common cultivation.
- Material
- hybrid maize Guidan 8e0
- Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione1
- Outcome
- root surface area,root length,volumne1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Comparator
- common cultivatione1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted to study root characters and yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation and common cultivation taking the hybrid maize Guidan 8 as the material”
e1“the root surface area,root length,volumn,number of root tips under no-tillage cultivation were all significantly lower than under common cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage cultivation significantly reduced the number of root tips of maize compared with common cultivation.
- Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione1
- Outcome
- number of root tipse1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Comparator
- common cultivatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted to study root characters and yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation and common cultivation taking the hybrid maize Guidan 8 as the material”
e1“the root surface area,root length,volumn,number of root tips under no-tillage cultivation were all significantly lower than under common cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage cultivation did not change maize root diameter compared with common cultivation.
- Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione0
- Outcome
- root diametere2
- Direction
- no significant differencee2
- Comparator
- common cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted to study root characters and yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation and common cultivation taking the hybrid maize Guidan 8 as the material”
e2“root diameter had no significant difference”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage cultivation significantly reduced ear leaf area and ear height of maize compared with tillage cultivation.
- Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione3
- Outcome
- ear leaf area and ear heighte3
- Direction
- lowere3
- Comparator
- tillage cultivatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted to study root characters and yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation and common cultivation taking the hybrid maize Guidan 8 as the material”
e3“Compared with tillage cultivation,ear leaf area and ear height were significantly lower under no-tillage cultivation,but plant height and stem diameter had no significant difference”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage cultivation did not change maize plant height or stem diameter compared with tillage cultivation.
- Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione3
- Outcome
- plant height and stem diametere3
- Direction
- no significant differencee3
- Comparator
- tillage cultivatione3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted to study root characters and yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation and common cultivation taking the hybrid maize Guidan 8 as the material”
e3“Compared with tillage cultivation,ear leaf area and ear height were significantly lower under no-tillage cultivation,but plant height and stem diameter had no significant difference”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage cultivation did not change bare stem rate, grain number or thousand kernel weight of maize compared with common cultivation.
- Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione0
- Outcome
- bare stem rate,grain number and thousand kernel weighte4
- Direction
- no significant differencee4
- Comparator
- common cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted to study root characters and yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation and common cultivation taking the hybrid maize Guidan 8 as the material”
e4“And for yield component factors,bare stem rate,grain number and thousand kernel weight had no significant difference either”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage cultivation significantly reduced the per capita yield of maize compared with tillage cultivation, owing to high lodging rate and fewer effective plants.
- Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione5
- Outcome
- per capita yielde5
- Direction
- lowere5
- Qualifier
- for its high lodging rate and fewer effective plant numbere5
- Comparator
- tillage cultivatione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The per capita yield of maize under no-tillage cultivation was significantly lower than under tillage cultivation for its high lodging rate and fewer effective plant number”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.