Paper · 2008 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Temperature on the Germination of Cotton Seeds

Wen Qing-lin

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The aim of the research was to study the germination characteristics of cotton seeds under different temperature conditions.[Method] With CCRI 35 and Xinhai 23 mainly cultivated in south Xinjiang as materials,2 kinds of culture methods(paper culture and sand culture) and 5 constant temperatures(8,12,20,24,28 ℃) were set up to study the effects of temperature on the germination of cotton seeds.[Result] Under each temperature,the germination rate of Xinhai 23 was higher than that of CCRI 35 and the average germination days were less than that of CCRI 35.With the decreasing of temperature,the germination rate of two cotton varieties slowed down and the germination rates showed the decreasing trends.At the same temperature,sand culture was more favorable for the germination of cotton seeds.It could increase the seed germination rate and quicken the seed germination speed.And the average germination days of seeds were less in sand culture.[Conclusion] Compared with CCRI 35,Xinhai 23 was more tolerant to low temperatures and it could be sowed earlier.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xinhai 23 had higher germination rate than CCRI 35 at each temperature.

Material
Xinhai 23e0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CCRI 35e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Under each temperature,the germination rate of Xinhai 23 was higher than that of CCRI 35”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xinhai 23 had fewer average germination days than CCRI 35 at each temperature.

Material
Xinhai 23e0
Outcome
average germination dayse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
CCRI 35e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Under each temperature,the germination rate of Xinhai 23 was higher than that of CCRI 35 and the average germination days were less than that of CCRI 35”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–569 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing temperature slowed germination and lowered germination rates in both cotton varieties.

Treatment
decreasing of temperaturee0
Outcome
germination ratese0
Direction
decreasing trendse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the decreasing of temperature,the germination rate of two cotton varieties slowed down and the germination rates showed the decreasing trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand culture increased cotton seed germination rate and speed compared with paper culture.

Treatment
sand culturee0
Outcome
seed germination rate and quicken the seed germination speede0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
paper culturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same temperature,sand culture was more favorable for the germination of cotton seeds.It could increase the seed germination rate and quicken the seed germination speed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“paper culture and sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand culture reduced average germination days of cotton seeds.

Treatment
sand culturee0
Outcome
average germination dayse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
paper culturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“And the average germination days of seeds were less in sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“paper culture and sand culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Xinhai 23 was more tolerant of low temperatures and was recommended for earlier sowing than CCRI 35.

Material
Xinhai 23e0
Outcome
could be sowed earliere0
Comparator
CCRI 35e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CCRI 35,Xinhai 23 was more tolerant to low temperatures and it could be sowed earlier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.