Paper · 2000

Effects of Supplementary UV-B Radiation on Photosynthesis and Partition of Leaf Nitrogen in Components of Photosynthetic Carbon Cycle in Leaves of Musa paradisiaca

Sun Gu; Peng Shao

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Respiration rate in light (Rd) and the CO 2 compensation point in absence of Rd (г *) were 0.33μmol·m -2 ·s -1 and 46.5μl·L -1 in leaves of Musa paradisiaca exposed to UV B radiation (4.8μW·cm -2 ) respectivty. They were higher than those in control plants by 5.6% and 10%, respectively. The initial slope of light response curves, the apparent quantum yield (α A) in leaves of control plants was 0.023±0.007 while the relative value was decreased by 13.0% in plants exposed to UV B radiation. A parameter related to the efficiency of light energy conversion (δ) was also decreased by 28.6% for plants exposed to UV B radiation in comparison with that of control plant. The partial An/Ci curves measured under θp 1100μmol·m -2 ·s -1 , was An=0.028Ci+ 1.41 for leaves of control plants and An=0.021Ci+1.01 for leaves exposed to UV B radiation. Maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) and electron transport rate in saturated θp in leaves exposed to UV B treatment were also lower than those of controls considerably. The partitioning coefficients for leaf nitrogen in Rubisco (P R) and in bioenergetic (P B) in leaves exposed to UV B radiation were lower than those of controls by 8.1% and 3.0%, respectively. And the fraction of leaf nitrogen in thylakoid light harvesting component (P L) increased finely in plant exposed to UV B radiation as compared to that of controls. The results imply that supplementary UV B radiation cause the decrease of nitrogen partition in the components of photosynthetic carbon cycle and decrease photosynthetic rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B exposed leaves had a light respiration rate of 0.33μmol·m -2 ·s -1, 5.6% above controls.

Taxon
Musa paradisiacaMusa ×paradisiacae0
Treatment
UV B radiation (4.8μW·cm -2 )e0
Outcome
Respiration rate in light (Rd)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.33μmol·m -2 ·s -1e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa x paradisiaca
Musa ×paradisiaca · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMuhammad Mahdi Karim · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration rate in light (Rd) and the CO 2 compensation point in absence of Rd (г *) were 0.33μmol·m -2 ·s -1 and 46.5μl·L -1 in leaves of Musa paradisiaca exposed to UV B radiation (4.8μW·cm -2 ) respectivty. They were higher than those in control plants by 5.6% and 10%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B exposed leaves had a CO2 compensation point of 46.5μl·L -1, 10% above controls.

Taxon
Musa paradisiacaMusa ×paradisiacae0
Treatment
UV B radiation (4.8μW·cm -2 )e0
Outcome
CO 2 compensation point in absence of Rd (г *)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
46.5μl·L -1e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Musa x paradisiaca
Musa ×paradisiaca · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMuhammad Mahdi Karim · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration rate in light (Rd) and the CO 2 compensation point in absence of Rd (г *) were 0.33μmol·m -2 ·s -1 and 46.5μl·L -1 in leaves of Musa paradisiaca exposed to UV B radiation (4.8μW·cm -2 ) respectivty. They were higher than those in control plants by 5.6% and 10%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent quantum yield decreased by 13.0% after UV-B exposure.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
UV B radiatione0
Outcome
apparent quantum yield (α A)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13.0%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“apparent quantum yield (α A) in leaves of control plants was 0.023±0.007 while the relative value was decreased by 13.0% in plants exposed to UV B radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light energy conversion efficiency parameter decreased by 28.6% under UV-B.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
UV B radiatione0
Outcome
efficiency of light energy conversion (δ)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
28.6%e0
Comparator
control plante0

Verbatim

e0

“A parameter related to the efficiency of light energy conversion (δ) was also decreased by 28.6% for plants exposed to UV B radiation in comparison with that of control plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The An/Ci curve was An=0.021Ci+1.01 under UV-B versus An=0.028Ci+ 1.41 in controls.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
UV B radiatione0
Outcome
An=0.021Ci+1.01e0
Value
An=0.021Ci+1.01e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“was An=0.028Ci+ 1.41 for leaves of control plants and An=0.021Ci+1.01 for leaves exposed to UV B radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum carboxylation rate was lower under UV-B than in controls.

Treatment
UV B treatmente0
Outcome
Maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) and electron transport rate in saturated θp in leaves exposed to UV B treatment were also lower than those of controls considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport rate in saturated θp was lower under UV-B than in controls.

Treatment
UV B treatmente0
Outcome
electron transport rate in saturated θpe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) and electron transport rate in saturated θp in leaves exposed to UV B treatment were also lower than those of controls considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen partitioning in Rubisco was 8.1% lower under UV-B.

Treatment
UV B radiatione0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen in Rubisco (P R)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8.1%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The partitioning coefficients for leaf nitrogen in Rubisco (P R) and in bioenergetic (P B) in leaves exposed to UV B radiation were lower than those of controls by 8.1% and 3.0%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen partitioning in bioenergetic components was 3.0% lower under UV-B.

Treatment
UV B radiatione0
Outcome
bioenergetic (P B)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
3.0%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The partitioning coefficients for leaf nitrogen in Rubisco (P R) and in bioenergetic (P B) in leaves exposed to UV B radiation were lower than those of controls by 8.1% and 3.0%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen fraction in thylakoid light harvesting components increased under UV-B.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
UV B radiatione0
Outcome
fraction of leaf nitrogen in thylakoid light harvesting component (P L)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“the fraction of leaf nitrogen in thylakoid light harvesting component (P L) increased finely in plant exposed to UV B radiation as compared to that of controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1368 · show in text ↑

radiation · physiology: respiration · Musa x paradisiaca (banana)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

radiation · physiology: photosynthesis · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Musa x paradisiaca (banana)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.