Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Plant Research

Influence of bulk density on soil resistance and yield of tobacco.

Ivan Turšić; Milan Mešić; Ivica Kisić; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Influence of soil compaction on the growth and development of flue-cured tobacco was investigated at the experimental station of the Tobacco institute Zagreb. Research was carried out in model trials, in Mitscherlich's pots. Three soil compaction levels (1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 gcm -3 ) were randomized according to the block method with four replications. The soil used in the trials was the plough Iayer of Luvisol, the soil typical of the area in which flue-cured tobacco is grown in Croatia. Tobacco was picked in six harvests, and after the sixth harvest the tobacco root yield was determined by washing it out in a sieve. The soil resistance to penetration was measured during tobacco flowering, and a statistically significant increase of soil resistance (compaction) was recorded in the soil with medium and the highest bulk density compared to that with the Iowest density, increased soil compaction considerably reduced leaf yields and root development of tobacco. Tobacco leaf and root yields were significantly increased by intensified fertilization. The highest leaf and root yields were obtained in the lowest soil compaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and highest soil bulk density increased penetration resistance compared with the lowest density.

Treatment
medium and the highest bulk densitye0
Outcome
soil resistance (compaction)e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Iowest densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a statistically significant increase of soil resistance (compaction) was recorded in the soil with medium and the highest bulk density compared to that with the Iowest density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased compaction reduced tobacco leaf yield.

Treatment
increased soil compactione0
Outcome
leaf yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil compaction considerably reduced leaf yields and root development of tobacco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased compaction reduced tobacco root development.

Treatment
increased soil compactione0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil compaction considerably reduced leaf yields and root development of tobacco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensified fertilization increased tobacco leaf and root yields.

Treatment
intensified fertilizatione0
Outcome
leaf and root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco leaf and root yields were significantly increased by intensified fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1056 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowest soil compaction produced the highest tobacco leaf and root yields.

Treatment
lowest soil compactione0
Outcome
leaf and root yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest leaf and root yields were obtained in the lowest soil compaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 187 positive, 27 negative or no effect

186 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.