Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Responses of Tobacco Growth and Development, Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Crop Yield and Economic Benefits to Smash Ridge Tillage and Nitrogen Reduction

Bufan Zheng; Yongfeng Jing; Yidong Zou; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Long-term rotary tillage leads to thinning of the soil layer and low nitrogen use efficiency of crops, resulting in a decrease in crop yield and quality. Therefore, a new alternative method to improve nitrogen use efficiency of crops needs to be found urgently. Here, we analyzed the effects of a new smash ridge tillage method combined with reduced nitrogen application on tobacco growth and development, and nitrogen use efficiency and its economic benefits. The results showed that, compared with conventional tillage and nitrogen application of 180 kg N ha−1, smash ridge tillage and a 30% reduction in nitrogen rate resulted in greater root length density, more primary lateral roots and greater rooting depth in the subsoil. It is also beneficial to maintain a high level of biomass and nitrogen accumulation in the later growth period, increasing the output value of tobacco by CNY 1588.35 ha−1 and reducing the cost by CNY 974.1 ha−1 on average in two years. In conclusion, our study highlights the economic benefits of smash ridge tillage and nitrogen reduction for tobacco growth and development, and considers them an effective method for improving agricultural productivity and nitrogen use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smash ridge tillage with a 30% nitrogen reduction gave greater root length density, more primary lateral roots and greater rooting depth in the subsoil than conventional tillage with 180 kg N ha−1.

Organ / stage
subsoile2
Treatment
smash ridge tillage and a 30% reduction in nitrogen ratee1
Outcome
root length density, more primary lateral roots and greater rooting depthe2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
conventional tillage and nitrogen application of 180 kg N ha−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on tobacco growth and development, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional tillage and nitrogen application of 180 kg N ha−1, smash ridge tillage and a 30% reduction in nitrogen rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–620 · show in text ↑
e2

“resulted in greater root length density, more primary lateral roots and greater rooting depth in the subsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–729 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smash ridge tillage with reduced nitrogen helps maintain a high level of biomass and nitrogen accumulation in the later growth period.

Organ / stage
later growth periode3
Treatment
smash ridge tillage and a 30% reduction in nitrogen ratee1
Outcome
biomass and nitrogen accumulatione3
Direction
maintain a high levele3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on tobacco growth and development, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional tillage and nitrogen application of 180 kg N ha−1, smash ridge tillage and a 30% reduction in nitrogen rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–620 · show in text ↑
e3

“It is also beneficial to maintain a high level of biomass and nitrogen accumulation in the later growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smash ridge tillage with reduced nitrogen reduced tobacco cost by CNY 974.1 ha−1 on average over two years.

Treatment
smash ridge tillage and a 30% reduction in nitrogen ratee1
Outcome
coste5
Direction
reducinge5
Value
CNY 974.1 ha−1e5
Comparator
conventional tillage and nitrogen application of 180 kg N ha−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on tobacco growth and development, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional tillage and nitrogen application of 180 kg N ha−1, smash ridge tillage and a 30% reduction in nitrogen rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–620 · show in text ↑
e5

“reducing the cost by CNY 974.1 ha−1 on average in two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–965 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude smash ridge tillage with nitrogen reduction is an effective method for tobacco productivity and nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
smash ridge tillage and nitrogen reductione6
Outcome
agricultural productivity and nitrogen use efficiencye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“our study highlights the economic benefits of smash ridge tillage and nitrogen reduction for tobacco growth and development, and considers them an effective method for improving agricultural productivity and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1213 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

103 papers: 85 positive, 18 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

tillage · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 56 positive, 17 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.