Paper · 1999 · Agronomy Journal

Relationships among Soil Nitrate, Leaf Nitrate, and Leaf Yield of Burley Tobacco

Charles T. MacKown; Steven J. Crafts‐Brandner; Tommy G. Sutton

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Burley tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) requires large amounts of fertilizer N to produce high yields of cured leaf with the quality traits demanded by buyers. However, excessive N use produces air‐cured leaves with undesirable levels of NO − 3 , is uneconomical, and is environmentally unsound if substantial levels of residual soil NO − 3 remain following harvest. Effects of N fertilizer on relationships among leaf yield, NO − 3 concentrations of air‐cured leaves, and soil NO − 3 levels were investigated in 1991 and 1992 at two locations near Lexington, KY. Fertilizer N was broadcast at 0 to 448 kg ha −1 (56‐kg increments) before transplanting or banded at 168 kg ha −1 about 5 wk after transplanting. Soils were a well‐drained Maury silt loam (fine, mixed, mesic Typic Paleudalf) and a moderately well‐drained Captina silt loam (fine, silty, siliceous, mesic Typic Fragiudult). Cured leaf yield and lamina NO − 3 increased with increasing amounts of broadcast fertilizer N. Yield increased 3.7% with banded N, compared with an equivalent amount of broadcast N. Banding N also increased the NO − 3 level of cured leaf lamina by 37% for bottom leaves and 17% for middle leaves; top leaves were unaffected. Soil mineral N (NH + 4 + NO − 3 ) was proportional to the amount of broadcast N applied, and NO − 3 levels in the upper 30 cm of soil declined during the growing season. For predicted maximum leaf yields of 90%, critical soil mineral N values of 46 and 88 mg kg −1 (for Captina and Maury soils, respectively) were estimated from average mineral N concentrations in the upper 30 cm at 3 and 5 wk after transplanting. Early‐season soil NO − 3 testing to predict the NO − 3 level of cured leaf lamina was not useful; a nearly twofold difference in lamina NO − 3 was observed among years when soil NO − 3 levels were equivalent. At 280 kg N ha −1 , a rate commonly recommended for burley tobacco, as much as 37 mg NO − 3 –N kg −1 soil was found in the upper 30 cm of soil following harvest. Decreasing the amount of fertilizer N broadcast just before transplanting to 168 kg N ha −1 caused a 10% reduction in yield, a 37 to 65% decrease in lamina NO − 3 , and about a 60% decrease in residual soil NO − 3 at harvest. Better N management can reduce both the NO − 3 level of cured leaves and the amount of residual NO − 3 following harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cured leaf yield rose with increasing broadcast nitrogen.

Taxon
leafe0
Treatment
broadcast fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
Cured leaf yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cured leaf yield and lamina NO − 3 increased with increasing amounts of broadcast fertilizer N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lamina nitrate rose with increasing broadcast nitrogen.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Treatment
broadcast fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
lamina NO − 3e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cured leaf yield and lamina NO − 3 increased with increasing amounts of broadcast fertilizer N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded nitrogen increased yield 3.7% over equivalent broadcast nitrogen.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Treatment
banded Ne0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.7%e0
Comparator
broadcast Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increased 3.7% with banded N, compared with an equivalent amount of broadcast N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banding nitrogen increased nitrate in bottom cured leaves by 37%.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Organ / stage
bottom leavese0
Treatment
Banding Ne0
Outcome
NO − 3 level of cured leaf laminae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Banding N also increased the NO − 3 level of cured leaf lamina by 37% for bottom leaves and 17% for middle leaves; top leaves were unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banding nitrogen increased nitrate in middle leaves by 17%.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Organ / stage
middle leavese0
Treatment
Banding Ne0
Outcome
NO − 3 level of cured leaf laminae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Banding N also increased the NO − 3 level of cured leaf lamina by 37% for bottom leaves and 17% for middle leaves; top leaves were unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banding nitrogen did not affect nitrate in top leaves.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Treatment
Banding Ne0
Outcome
top leaves were unaffectede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Banding N also increased the NO − 3 level of cured leaf lamina by 37% for bottom leaves and 17% for middle leaves; top leaves were unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil mineral nitrogen was proportional to broadcast nitrogen amount.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Treatment
broadcast Ne0
Outcome
Soil mineral Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil mineral N (NH + 4 + NO − 3 ) was proportional to the amount of broadcast N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-soil nitrate declined during the growing season.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Outcome
NO − 3 levels in the upper 30 cm of soile0
Direction
declinede0

Verbatim

e0

“NO − 3 levels in the upper 30 cm of soil declined during the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical soil mineral nitrogen for 90% predicted maximum yield was 46 mg kg−1 for Captina soil.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Outcome
critical soil mineral N valuese0
Value
46e0
Qualifier
Captinae0

Verbatim

e0

“For predicted maximum leaf yields of 90%, critical soil mineral N values of 46 and 88 mg kg −1 (for Captina and Maury soils, respectively) were estimated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical soil mineral nitrogen for 90% predicted maximum yield was 88 mg kg−1 for Maury soil.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Outcome
critical soil mineral N valuese0
Value
88 mg kg −1e0
Qualifier
Maurye0

Verbatim

e0

“For predicted maximum leaf yields of 90%, critical soil mineral N values of 46 and 88 mg kg −1 (for Captina and Maury soils, respectively) were estimated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early season soil nitrate testing was not useful for predicting cured leaf nitrate.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Outcome
was not usefule0
Value
nearly twofolde0
Comparator
soil NO − 3 levels were equivalente0

Verbatim

e0

“Early‐season soil NO − 3 testing to predict the NO − 3 level of cured leaf lamina was not useful; a nearly twofold difference in lamina NO − 3 was observed among years when soil NO − 3 levels were equivalent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 280 kg N ha−1, postharvest upper-soil nitrate reached 37 mg nitrate-N kg−1.

Taxon
burley tobaccoe0
Treatment
280 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
NO − 3 –Ne0
Value
37 mg NO − 3 –N kg −1 soile0

Verbatim

e0

“At 280 kg N ha −1 , a rate commonly recommended for burley tobacco, as much as 37 mg NO − 3 –N kg −1 soil was found in the upper 30 cm of soil following harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–1998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing broadcast nitrogen to 168 kg N ha−1 reduced yield 10%.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Treatment
168 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the amount of fertilizer N broadcast just before transplanting to 168 kg N ha −1 caused a 10% reduction in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing broadcast nitrogen to 168 kg N ha−1 decreased lamina nitrate 37 to 65%.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Treatment
168 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
lamina NO − 3e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
37 to 65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the amount of fertilizer N broadcast just before transplanting to 168 kg N ha −1 caused a 10% reduction in yield, a 37 to 65% decrease in lamina NO − 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing broadcast nitrogen to 168 kg N ha−1 decreased residual soil nitrate about 60%.

Taxon
Burley Tobaccot0
Treatment
168 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
residual soil NO − 3e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the amount of fertilizer N broadcast just before transplanting to 168 kg N ha −1 caused a 10% reduction in yield, a 37 to 65% decrease in lamina NO − 3 , and about a 60% decrease in residual soil NO − 3 at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burley Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

81 papers: 72 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

103 papers: 85 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

transplanting · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 35 positive, 10 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.