Paper · 2010 · PubMed

Effect of organic materials and rice cultivars on methane emission from rice field.

Maninder Kaur Khosa; B S Sidhu; D K Benbi

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
87
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for two years on a sandy loam (Typic Ustochrept) soil of Punjab to study the effect of organic materials and rice cultivars on methane emission from rice fields. The methane flux varied between 0.04 and 0.93 mg m(-2) hr(-1) in bare soil and transplanting of rice crop doubled the methane flux (0.07 to 2.06 mg m(-2) hr(-1)). Among rice cultivars, significantly (p < 0.05) higher amount of methane was emitted from Pusa 44 compared to PR 118 and PR 111. Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields and resulted in increased soil organic carbon content. The greatest seasonal methane flux was observed in wheat straw amended plots (229.6 kg ha(-1)) followed by farmyard manure (111.6 kg ha(-1)), green manure (85.4 kg ha(-1)) and the least from rice straw compost amended plots (36.9 kg ha(-1)) as compared to control (21.5 kg ha(-1)). The differential effect of organic materials in enhancing methane flux was related to total carbon or C:N ratio of the material. The results showed that incorporation of humified organic matter such as rice straw compost could minimize methane emission from rice fields with co-benefits of increased soil fertility and crop productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bare-soil methane flux varied between 0.04 and 0.93 mg m(-2) hr(-1).

Outcome
methane fluxe2
Value
0.04 and 0.93 mg m(-2) hr(-1)e2
Setting
bare soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The methane flux varied between 0.04 and 0.93 mg m(-2) hr(-1) in bare soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–269 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanting of rice crop doubled the methane flux (0.07 to 2.06 mg m(-2) hr(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting rice doubled methane flux relative to bare soil (0.07 to 2.06 mg m(-2) hr(-1)).

Treatment
transplanting of rice crope1
Outcome
methane fluxe1
Direction
doublede1
Value
0.07 to 2.06 mg m(-2) hr(-1)e1
Comparator
bare soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“transplanting of rice crop doubled the methane flux (0.07 to 2.06 mg m(-2) hr(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–356 · show in text ↑
e2

“The methane flux varied between 0.04 and 0.93 mg m(-2) hr(-1) in bare soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa 44 emitted significantly more methane than PR 118 and PR 111.

Material
Pusa 44e3
Treatment
rice cultivarse3
Outcome
amount of methanee3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
PR 118 and PR 111e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Among rice cultivars, significantly (p < 0.05) higher amount of methane was emitted from Pusa 44 compared to PR 118 and PR 111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields.

Treatment
Application of organic materialse4
Outcome
methane emissione4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of organic materials increased soil organic carbon content.

Treatment
Application of organic materialse4
Outcome
soil organic carbon contente5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–561 · show in text ↑
e5

“resulted in increased soil organic carbon content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw amended plots had the greatest seasonal methane flux (229.6 kg ha(-1)), compared with control (21.5 kg ha(-1)).

Treatment
wheat straw amended plotse6
Outcome
seasonal methane fluxe6
Direction
greateste6
Value
229.6 kg ha(-1)e6
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The greatest seasonal methane flux was observed in wheat straw amended plots (229.6 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–711 · show in text ↑
e7

“as compared to control (21.5 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–897 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure gave a higher seasonal methane flux (111.6 kg ha(-1)) than control (21.5 kg ha(-1)).

Treatment
farmyard manuree5
Outcome
seasonal methane fluxe6
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
111.6 kg ha(-1)e5
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“followed by farmyard manure (111.6 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–757 · show in text ↑
e7

“as compared to control (21.5 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–897 · show in text ↑
e6

“The greatest seasonal methane flux was observed in wheat straw amended plots (229.6 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–711 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure gave a higher seasonal methane flux (85.4 kg ha(-1)) than control (21.5 kg ha(-1)).

Treatment
green manuree5
Outcome
seasonal methane fluxe6
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
85.4 kg ha(-1)e5
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“green manure (85.4 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–788 · show in text ↑
e7

“as compared to control (21.5 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–897 · show in text ↑
e6

“The greatest seasonal methane flux was observed in wheat straw amended plots (229.6 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–711 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw compost amended plots had the least seasonal methane flux among the amendments (36.9 kg ha(-1)), but more than control (21.5 kg ha(-1)).

Treatment
rice straw compost amended plotse5
Outcome
seasonal methane fluxe6
Direction
leaste5
Value
36.9 kg ha(-1)e5
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the least from rice straw compost amended plots (36.9 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–857 · show in text ↑
e7

“as compared to control (21.5 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–897 · show in text ↑
e6

“The greatest seasonal methane flux was observed in wheat straw amended plots (229.6 kg ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–711 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–561 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating humified organic matter such as rice straw compost could minimize methane emission from rice fields.

Treatment
incorporation of humified organic matter such as rice straw composte5
Outcome
methane emissione5
Direction
minimizee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“incorporation of humified organic matter such as rice straw compost could minimize methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating humified organic matter such as rice straw compost is associated with co-benefits of increased soil fertility and crop productivity.

Treatment
incorporation of humified organic matter such as rice straw composte0
Outcome
soil fertility and crop productivitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of humified organic matter such as rice straw compost could minimize methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“with co-benefits of increased soil fertility and crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1235 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The differential effect of organic materials on methane flux was related to total carbon or C:N ratio of the material.

Treatment
organic materialse2
Outcome
methane fluxe2
Qualifier
total carbon or C:N ratioe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The differential effect of organic materials in enhancing methane flux was related to total carbon or C:N ratio of the material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1026 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of organic materials enhanced methane emission from rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–561 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

108 papers: 73 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

transplanting · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.