Abstract
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are soil bacteria that are able to colonize rhizosphere and to enhance plant growth by means of a wide variety of mechanisms. In the present study, Myristica yunnanensis and Stenotrophomonas chelatiphaga strains were recognized as new records in Iran flora. According to the results, these strains significantly affected plants’ zinc and phosphorous contents which could be due to the production of phytosiderophore. Siderophore-producing bacteria increased canola zinc (Zn) content as strategy-I plant, while in maize, it can be said that probably the effect of phytosiderophore produced by plant on increasing root and shoot Zn content was more than siderophore produced by bacteria. These isolates could be used as bio-input for improving the plant productivity as a substitute to chemical fertilizers and also to correct the nutrient deficiencies in canola and maize for sustainable agriculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The bacterial strains significantly affected plant zinc and phosphorus contents.
- Taxon
- Canola and Maize
Zea mays
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- these strainse0
- Interactor
- Myristica yunnanensis and Stenotrophomonas chelatiphagaMyristica yunnanensisStenotrophomonas chelatiphagae1symbiont
- Outcome
- plants’ zinc and phosphorous contentse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“these strains significantly affected plants’ zinc and phosphorous contents”
t0“Canola and Maize”
e1“Myristica yunnanensis and Stenotrophomonas chelatiphaga strains”
Claim · model-written summary
Siderophore producing bacteria increased canola zinc content.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napuse0 - Treatment
- Siderophore-producing bacteriae0
- Interactor
- Siderophore-producing bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- canola zinc (Zn) contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Siderophore-producing bacteria increased canola zinc (Zn) content as strategy-I plant”
Claim · model-written summary
In maize, plant phytosiderophore probably contributed more to root and shoot zinc than bacterial siderophore.
- Outcome
- root and shoot Zn contente0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Qualifier
- probablye0
- Comparator
- siderophore produced by bacteriae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“in maize, it can be said that probably the effect of phytosiderophore produced by plant on increasing root and shoot Zn content was more than siderophore produced by bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose these isolates as bio-inputs to improve plant productivity and correct nutrient deficiencies.
- Taxon
- canola and maize
Zea mays
Brassica napus var. napuse0 - Outcome
- used as bio-input for improving the plant productivity as a substitute to chemical fertilizers and also to correct the nutrient deficienciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“These isolates could be used as bio-input for improving the plant productivity as a substitute to chemical fertilizers and also to correct the nutrient deficiencies in canola and maize”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.