Paper · 2003 · HortScience

Weed Control in Strawberry Provided by Shank- and Drip-applied Methyl Bromide Alternative Fumigants

S.A. Fennimore; M.J. Haar; H.A. Ajwa

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The loss of methyl bromide (MB) as a soil fumigant has created the need for new weed management systems for crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne). Potential alternative chemicals to replace methyl bromide fumigation include 1,3-D, chloropicrin (CP), and metam sodium. Application of emulsified formulations of these fumigants through the drip irrigation system is being tested as an alternative to the standard shank injection method of fumigant application in strawberry production. The goal of this research was to evaluate the weed control efficacy of alternative fumigants applied through the drip irrigation system and by shank injection. The fumigant 1,3-D in a mixture with CP was drip-applied as InLine (60% 1,3-D plus 32% CP) at 236 and 393 L·ha -1 or shank injected as Telone C35 (62% 1,3-D plus 35% CP) at 374 L·ha -1 . Chloropicrin (CP EC, 95%) was drip-applied singly at 130 and 200 L·ha -1 or shank injected (CP, 99%) at 317 kg·ha -1 . Vapam HL (metam sodium 42%) was drip-applied singly at 420 and 700 L·ha -1 . InLine was drip-applied at 236 and 393 L·ha -1 , and then 6 d later followed by (fb) drip-applied Vapam HL at 420 and 700 L·ha -1 , respectively. CP EC was drip-applied simultaneously with Vapam HL at 130 plus 420 L·ha -1 and as a sequential application at 200 fb 420 L·ha -1 , respectively. Results were compared to the commercial standard, MB : CP mixture (67:33) shank-applied at 425 kg·ha -1 and the untreated control. Chloropicrin EC at 200 L·ha -1 and InLine at 236 to 393 L·ha -1 each applied singly controlled weeds as well as MB : CP at 425 kg·ha -1 . Application of these fumigants through the drip irrigation systems provided equal or better weed control than equivalent rates applied by shank injection. InLine and CP EC efficacy on little mallow ( Malva parviflora L.) or prostrate knotweed ( Polygonum aviculare L.) seed buried at the center of the bed did not differ from MB : CP. However, the percentage of weed seed survival at the edge of the bed was often higher in the drip-applied treatments than in the shank-applied treatments, possibly due to the close proximity of the shank-injected fumigant to the edge of the bed. Vapam HL was generally less effective than MB : CP on the native weed population or on weed seed. The use of Vapam HL in combination with InLine or CP EC did not provide additional weed control benefit. Chemical names used: 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D); sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate (metam sodium); methyl bromide; trichloro-nitromethane (chloropicrin).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin EC at 200 L·ha -1 applied singly controlled weeds in strawberry as well as MB:CP at 425 kg·ha -1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Chloropicrin EC at 200 L·ha -1e1
Outcome
weedse1
Direction
controllede1
Comparator
MB : CP at 425 kg·ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chloropicrin EC at 200 L·ha -1 and InLine at 236 to 393 L·ha -1 each applied singly controlled weeds as well as MB : CP at 425 kg·ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

InLine at 236 to 393 L·ha -1 applied singly controlled weeds in strawberry as well as MB:CP at 425 kg·ha -1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
InLine at 236 to 393 L·ha -1e1
Outcome
weedse1
Direction
controllede1
Comparator
MB : CP at 425 kg·ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chloropicrin EC at 200 L·ha -1 and InLine at 236 to 393 L·ha -1 each applied singly controlled weeds as well as MB : CP at 425 kg·ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip application of the fumigants gave equal or better weed control in strawberry than equivalent shank injection.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Application of these fumigants through the drip irrigation systemse2
Outcome
weed controle2
Direction
equal or bettere2
Comparator
shank injectione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–164 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of these fumigants through the drip irrigation systems provided equal or better weed control than equivalent rates applied by shank injection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

InLine and CP EC efficacy on little mallow and prostrate knotweed seed buried at the bed center did not differ from MB:CP.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
InLine and CP ECe3
Interactor
little mallowe3weed
Second interactor
prostrate knotweede3weed
Outcome
efficacye3
Direction
did not differe3
Qualifier
seed buried at the center of the bede3
Comparator
MB : CPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–164 · show in text ↑
e3

“InLine and CP EC efficacy on little mallow ( Malva parviflora L.) or prostrate knotweed ( Polygonum aviculare L.) seed buried at the center of the bed did not differ from MB : CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed seed survival at the bed edge was often higher with drip-applied than with shank-applied fumigant treatments in strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
drip-applied treatmentse4
Interactor
weed seede4weed
Outcome
weed seed survivale4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
at the edge of the bede4
Comparator
shank-applied treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–164 · show in text ↑
e4

“the percentage of weed seed survival at the edge of the bed was often higher in the drip-applied treatments than in the shank-applied treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vapam HL was generally less effective than MB:CP on the native weed population or on weed seed in strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Vapam HLe5
Interactor
native weed populatione5weed
Outcome
native weed population or on weed seede5
Direction
less effectivee5
Comparator
MB : CPe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–164 · show in text ↑
e5

“Vapam HL was generally less effective than MB : CP on the native weed population or on weed seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2188–2284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Vapam HL to InLine or CP EC gave no additional weed control benefit in strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Vapam HL in combination with InLine or CP ECe6
Outcome
additional weed control benefite6
Direction
did not providee6
Comparator
InLine or CP ECe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crops such as strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–164 · show in text ↑
e6

“The use of Vapam HL in combination with InLine or CP EC did not provide additional weed control benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2286–2389 · show in text ↑

chloropicrin · control · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fumigant · weed · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chloropicrin · weed · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · weed · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.