Paper · 1991 · Weed Technology

Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Primisulfuron and Nicosulfuron

Rolando F. Camacho; Loren J. Moshier; Don W. Morishita; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the greenhouse, soil applications of primisulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 ) reduced growth of emerged rhizome johnsongrass plants more than nicosulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 ). Both herbicides reduced growth more when applied to foliage only; a further decrease in growth did not occur for applications to both soil and foliage. Primisulfuron did not completely prevent regrowth of johnsongrass with any application method. Nicosulfuron prevented regrowth when applied to the foliage and to both soil and foliage. In single-year field studies in corn at four dryland sites and two irrigated sites, 50:50 split applications of primisulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 ) and nicosulfuron (35 g ai ha –1 ) approximately 2 wk apart provided the most consistent rhizome johnsongrass control compared with early or late single applications when visually rated 8 wk after the first application. Nicosulfuron treatments were more effective than primisulfuron treatments at both dryland sites the first year and at one of two dryland sites the second year. Primisulfuron and nicosulfuron at the irrigated site the first year were equivalent in efficacy. Nicosulfuron was more effective than primisulfuron at the irrigated site the second year. Primisulfuron or nicosulfuron treatments more than doubled corn yields at the dryland sites both years regardless of application timing. Split applications of primisulfuron or nicosulfuron provided the highest yields (approximately 80% increase over untreated plots) at the irrigated site the first year. All treatments provided equivalent yield increases (approximately 50%) the second year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil primisulfuron reduced emerged johnsongrass growth more than soil nicosulfuron.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee0
Treatment
primisulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 )e0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee0weed
Outcome
growth of emerged rhizome johnsongrass plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nicosulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil applications of primisulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 ) reduced growth of emerged rhizome johnsongrass plants more than nicosulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage application reduced johnsongrass growth more than soil application for both herbicides.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepenset0
Treatment
foliage onlye0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepenset0weed
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both herbicides reduced growth more when applied to foliage only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding soil application to foliage application did not further decrease johnsongrass growth.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepenset0
Treatment
both soil and foliagee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not occure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a further decrease in growth did not occur for applications to both soil and foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primisulfuron did not completely prevent johnsongrass regrowth by any application method.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee0
Treatment
Primisulfurone0
Outcome
regrowth of johnsongrasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primisulfuron did not completely prevent regrowth of johnsongrass with any application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron prevented johnsongrass regrowth when applied to foliage or both soil and foliage.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepenset0
Treatment
Nicosulfurone0
Outcome
prevented regrowthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicosulfuron prevented regrowth when applied to the foliage and to both soil and foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split primisulfuron and nicosulfuron applications gave the most consistent johnsongrass control compared with single applications.

Treatment
50:50 split applications of primisulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 ) and nicosulfuron (35 g ai ha –1 )e0
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee0weed
Outcome
rhizome johnsongrass controle0
Direction
most consistente0
Comparator
early or late single applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50:50 split applications of primisulfuron (40 g ai ha –1 ) and nicosulfuron (35 g ai ha –1 ) approximately 2 wk apart provided the most consistent rhizome johnsongrass control compared with early or late single applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron was more effective than primisulfuron at both dryland sites in year one and one of two in year two.

Treatment
Nicosulfuron treatmentse0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
primisulfuron treatmentse0
Setting
dryland sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicosulfuron treatments were more effective than primisulfuron treatments at both dryland sites the first year and at one of two dryland sites the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two herbicides had equivalent efficacy at the irrigated site in year one.

Treatment
Primisulfurone0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
nicosulfurone0
Setting
irrigated sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primisulfuron and nicosulfuron at the irrigated site the first year were equivalent in efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron was more effective than primisulfuron at the irrigated site in year two.

Treatment
Nicosulfurone0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
primisulfurone0
Setting
irrigated sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicosulfuron was more effective than primisulfuron at the irrigated site the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primisulfuron treatments more than doubled corn yields at dryland sites in both years.

Treatment
Primisulfurone0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
more than doublede0
Setting
dryland sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primisulfuron or nicosulfuron treatments more than doubled corn yields at the dryland sites both years regardless of application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron treatments more than doubled corn yields at dryland sites in both years.

Treatment
nicosulfurone0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
more than doublede0
Setting
dryland sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primisulfuron or nicosulfuron treatments more than doubled corn yields at the dryland sites both years regardless of application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split primisulfuron applications gave the highest irrigated corn yields in year one, about 80% above untreated plots.

Treatment
Split applications of primisulfurone0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
approximately 80%e0
Comparator
untreated plotse0
Setting
irrigated sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split applications of primisulfuron or nicosulfuron provided the highest yields (approximately 80% increase over untreated plots) at the irrigated site the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nicosulfuron applications gave the highest irrigated corn yields in year one, about 80% above untreated plots.

Treatment
nicosulfurone0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
approximately 80%e0
Comparator
untreated plotse0
Setting
irrigated sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split applications of primisulfuron or nicosulfuron provided the highest yields (approximately 80% increase over untreated plots) at the irrigated site the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments gave equivalent corn yield increases of approximately 50% in year two.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
approximately 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments provided equivalent yield increases (approximately 50%) the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizome Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Primisulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Primisulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Primisulfuron · Sorghum halepense · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nicosulfuron · Sorghum halepense · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.