Paper · 1997 · Weed Technology

Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron

Joseph A. Bruce; James J. Kells

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Quackgrass is a serious weed problem in the northern United States and southern Canada. Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn. Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) and primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha) each provided 84% or greater control of two-leaf plants and 93% or greater control of four-leaf quackgrass plants. Sequential applications of both nicosulfuron and primisulfuron provided greater season-long control than single applications of the same rate on two-leaf but not four-leaf quackgrass. Cultivation 10 d after nicosulfuron or primisulfuron application often increased early-season control, but by corn harvest few differences were observed. Postemergence (POST) applications of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron provided at least 88% control, compared with 66 to 86% from an early preplant application of glyphosate. Corn yields were similar regardless of the quackgrass control program.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) gave 84% or greater control of two-leaf quackgrass plants.

Organ / stage
two-leaf plantse1
Treatment
Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha)e1
Interactor
quackgrasse1weed
Outcome
control of two-leaf plantse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
84% or greatere1
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) and primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha) each provided 84% or greater control of two-leaf plants and 93% or greater control of four-leaf quackgrass plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha) gave 84% or greater control of two-leaf quackgrass plants.

Organ / stage
two-leaf plantse1
Treatment
primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha)e1
Interactor
quackgrasse1weed
Outcome
control of two-leaf plantse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
84% or greatere1
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) and primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha) each provided 84% or greater control of two-leaf plants and 93% or greater control of four-leaf quackgrass plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) gave 93% or greater control of four-leaf quackgrass plants.

Organ / stage
four-leafe1
Treatment
Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha)e1
Interactor
quackgrasse1weed
Outcome
control of four-leaf quackgrass plantse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
93% or greatere1
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) and primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha) each provided 84% or greater control of two-leaf plants and 93% or greater control of four-leaf quackgrass plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha) gave 93% or greater control of four-leaf quackgrass plants.

Organ / stage
four-leafe1
Treatment
primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha)e1
Interactor
quackgrasse1weed
Outcome
control of four-leaf quackgrass plantse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
93% or greatere1
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) and primisulfuron (40 g ai/ha) each provided 84% or greater control of two-leaf plants and 93% or greater control of four-leaf quackgrass plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential applications of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron gave greater season-long quackgrass control than single applications on two-leaf plants.

Organ / stage
two-leafe2
Treatment
Sequential applications of both nicosulfuron and primisulfurone2
Interactor
quackgrasse2weed
Outcome
season-long controle2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
single applications of the same ratee2
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sequential applications of both nicosulfuron and primisulfuron provided greater season-long control than single applications of the same rate on two-leaf but not four-leaf quackgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential applications of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron gave no greater season-long quackgrass control than single applications on four-leaf plants.

Organ / stage
four-leaf quackgrasse2
Treatment
Sequential applications of both nicosulfuron and primisulfurone2
Interactor
quackgrasse2weed
Outcome
season-long controle2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
single applications of the same ratee2
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sequential applications of both nicosulfuron and primisulfuron provided greater season-long control than single applications of the same rate on two-leaf but not four-leaf quackgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation 10 days after herbicide application often increased early-season quackgrass control.

Treatment
Cultivation 10 d after nicosulfuron or primisulfuron applicatione3
Outcome
early-season controle3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
oftene3
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e3

“Cultivation 10 d after nicosulfuron or primisulfuron application often increased early-season control, but by corn harvest few differences were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By corn harvest, cultivation showed few differences in quackgrass control.

Treatment
Cultivation 10 d after nicosulfuron or primisulfuron applicatione3
Outcome
few differences were observede3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Cultivation 10 d after nicosulfuron or primisulfuron application often increased early-season control, but by corn harvest few differences were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence nicosulfuron and primisulfuron gave at least 88% quackgrass control, higher than an early preplant glyphosate application at 66 to 86%.

Treatment
Postemergence (POST) applications of nicosulfuron and primisulfurone4
Interactor
Quackgrasst0weed
Outcome
controle4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
at least 88%e4
Qualifier
66 to 86%e4
Comparator
early preplant application of glyphosatee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to examine the effect of herbicide rate, application timing, quackgrass growth stage, and cultivation on quackgrass control with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–305 · show in text ↑
e4

“Postemergence (POST) applications of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron provided at least 88% control, compared with 66 to 86% from an early preplant application of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Control in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields were similar regardless of the quackgrass control program.

Treatment
quackgrass control programe5
Interactor
quackgrasse5weed
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Corn yields were similar regardless of the quackgrass control program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1059 · show in text ↑

Primisulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nicosulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.