Paper · 2016 · PLoS ONE

Interactive Effects of Elevated [CO2] and Drought on the Maize Phytochemical Defense Response against Mycotoxigenic Fusarium verticillioides

Martha M. Vaughan; Alisa Huffaker; Eric A. Schmelz; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Changes in climate due to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) are predicted to intensify episodes of drought, but our understanding of how these combined conditions will influence crop-pathogen interactions is limited. We recently demonstrated that elevated [CO2] alone enhances maize susceptibility to the mycotoxigenic pathogen, Fusarium verticillioides (Fv) but fumonisin levels remain unaffected. In this study we show that maize simultaneously exposed to elevated [CO2] and drought are even more susceptible to Fv proliferation and also prone to higher levels of fumonisin contamination. Despite the increase in fumonisin levels, the amount of fumonisin produced in relation to pathogen biomass remained lower than corresponding plants grown at ambient [CO2]. Therefore, the increase in fumonisin contamination was likely due to even greater pathogen biomass rather than an increase in host-derived stimulants. Drought did not negate the compromising effects of elevated [CO2] on the accumulation of maize phytohormones and metabolites. However, since elevated [CO2] does not influence the drought-induced accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) or root terpenoid phytoalexins, the effects elevated [CO2] are negated belowground, but the stifled defense response aboveground may be a consequence of resource redirection to the roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined elevated CO2 and drought increased maize susceptibility to Fv proliferation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated [CO2] and droughte0
Interactor
Fve0pathogen
Outcome
susceptible to Fv proliferatione0
Direction
even more susceptiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize simultaneously exposed to elevated [CO2] and drought are even more susceptible to Fv proliferation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined elevated CO2 and drought increased fumonisin contamination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated [CO2] and droughte0
Interactor
Fve0pathogen
Outcome
fumonisin contaminatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize simultaneously exposed to elevated [CO2] and drought are even more susceptible to Fv proliferation and also prone to higher levels of fumonisin contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumonisin production per pathogen biomass remained lower than in plants at ambient CO2.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]t0
Interactor
Fusarium verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidest0pathogen
Outcome
fumonisin produced in relation to pathogen biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ambient [CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of fumonisin produced in relation to pathogen biomass remained lower than corresponding plants grown at ambient [CO2].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elevated [CO2] and Drought on the Maize Phytochemical Defense Response against Mycotoxigenic Fusarium verticillioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–140 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute higher fumonisin contamination to greater pathogen biomass.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Fusarium verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidest0pathogen
Outcome
increase in fumonisin contaminatione0
Qualifier
greater pathogen biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in fumonisin contamination was likely due to even greater pathogen biomass rather than an increase in host-derived stimulants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Phytochemical Defense Response against Mycotoxigenic Fusarium verticillioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought did not negate elevated CO2 effects on maize phytohormone and metabolite accumulation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
accumulation of maize phytohormones and metabolitese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought did not negate the compromising effects of elevated [CO2] on the accumulation of maize phytohormones and metabolites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not influence drought-induced abscisic acid accumulation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
drought-induced accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA)e0
Direction
does not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated [CO2] does not influence the drought-induced accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not influence drought-induced root terpenoid phytoalexins.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
root terpenoid phytoalexinse0
Direction
does not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated [CO2] does not influence the drought-induced accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) or root terpenoid phytoalexins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest resource redirection to roots may explain stifled aboveground defense.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
stifled defense response abovegrounde0
Qualifier
resource redirection to the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stifled defense response aboveground may be a consequence of resource redirection to the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑

co2 · Fusarium verticillioides · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

co2 · physiology: hormones · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

co2 · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: hormones · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 3 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 5 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 11 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.