Paper · 2003 · HortScience

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Availability and Weed Suppression from Composted Poultry Litter Applied as Mulch in a Peach Orchard

P.L. Preusch; T.J. Tworkoski

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Composted poultry litter (CPL) may be applied as a mulch in fruit orchards to manage waste and to provide a slow-release nutrient source and weed control. With proper management, poultry manure and bedding (litter) can prevent environmental degradation, such as hypoxia in aquatic communities. Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots all received preemergence herbicides in May and then the following treatments in June 1998: commercial fertilizer (N at 15 g·m -2 ), low rate CPL (N at 15 g·m -2 as CPL at 2.9 kg·m -2 ), high rate CPL (N at 62 g·m -2 as CPL at 11.6 kg·m -2 ), and no fertilizer or mulch control. Weeds were completely controlled by mulch and herbicide during 1998 but not during 1999. By Sept. 1999, the high rate of CPL had only 27% weed cover compared with 86% for the commercial fertilizer-treated plots. Soil N was highest (NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at 16.4 and 18.6 mg·kg -1 soil, respectively) in plots treated with commercial fertilizer, 6 weeks after treatment (WAT). Soil N did not differ among the two CPL treatments and the control at any time. At the high rate of CPL, there was NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at 3.2 and 0.7 mg·kg -1 soil, respectively, at 6 WAT. Water-extractable P (WEP) in the soil did not differ among the CPL and commercial fertilizer treatments at 6 WAT (P at §14 mg·kg -1 soil). However, at 47 WAT, plots with the high rate of CPL had significantly higher WEP, with P at 30 mg·kg -1 soil vs. 14 mg·kg -1 soil in plots treated with commercial fertilizer. High applications of CPL could elevate P in surface runoff to levels that cause environmental degradation. In general, Mehlich 1-extractable P (MEP) did not differ among the CPL- and fertilizer-treated plots (averaging P at 45 mg·kg -1 soil). MEP was lowest in control plots (averaging P at 21 mg·kg -1 soil). Results indicate that CPL could be used as a weed suppressant without adversely affecting N release to the environment; however, P concentration in soil water may be problematic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and herbicide completely controlled weeds in 1998 but not 1999.

Treatment
mulch and herbicidee0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
Weedse0
Direction
completely controllede0
Qualifier
during 1998 but not during 1999e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds were completely controlled by mulch and herbicide during 1998 but not during 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate litter plots had 27% weed cover versus 86% under commercial fertilizer by September 1999.

Treatment
high rate of CPLe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed covere0
Direction
onlye0
Value
27%e0
Qualifier
86%e0
Comparator
commercial fertilizer-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By Sept. 1999, the high rate of CPL had only 27% weed cover compared with 86% for the commercial fertilizer-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial fertilizer yielded the highest soil ammonium nitrogen at six weeks, 16.4 mg per kg.

Treatment
commercial fertilizere0
Outcome
Soil Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.4e0
Qualifier
6 weeks after treatment (WAT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil N was highest (NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at 16.4 and 18.6 mg·kg -1 soil, respectively) in plots treated with commercial fertilizer, 6 weeks after treatment (WAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial fertilizer yielded the highest soil nitrate nitrogen at six weeks, 18.6 mg per kg.

Treatment
commercial fertilizere0
Outcome
NO 3 -Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.6 mg·kg -1 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil N was highest (NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at 16.4 and 18.6 mg·kg -1 soil, respectively) in plots treated with commercial fertilizer, 6 weeks after treatment (WAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen did not differ between the two litter treatments and control.

Treatment
two CPL treatmentse0
Outcome
Soil Ne0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil N did not differ among the two CPL treatments and the control at any time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate litter plots contained 3.2 mg per kg soil ammonium at six weeks.

Treatment
high rate of CPLe0
Outcome
NH 4 -Ne0
Value
3.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the high rate of CPL, there was NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at 3.2 and 0.7 mg·kg -1 soil, respectively, at 6 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate litter plots contained 0.7 mg per kg soil nitrate at six weeks.

Treatment
high rate of CPLe0
Outcome
NO 3 -Ne0
Value
0.7 mg·kg -1 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the high rate of CPL, there was NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N at 3.2 and 0.7 mg·kg -1 soil, respectively, at 6 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-extractable soil phosphorus did not differ between litter and fertilizer at six weeks.

Treatment
CPLe0
Outcome
Water-extractable P (WEP) in the soile0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
commercial fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-extractable P (WEP) in the soil did not differ among the CPL and commercial fertilizer treatments at 6 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1291 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 47 weeks, high-rate litter plots had significantly higher water-extractable soil phosphorus, 30 versus 14 mg per kg under fertilizer.

Treatment
high rate of CPLe0
Outcome
WEPe0
Direction
highere0
Value
30 mg·kg -1 soile0
Qualifier
14 mg·kg -1 soile0
Comparator
commercial fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 47 WAT, plots with the high rate of CPL had significantly higher WEP, with P at 30 mg·kg -1 soil vs. 14 mg·kg -1 soil in plots treated with commercial fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1491 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mehlich-extractable soil phosphorus generally did not differ between litter and fertilizer plots.

Treatment
CPL-e0
Outcome
Mehlich 1-extractable P (MEP)e0
Direction
did not differe0
Value
45 mg·kg -1 soile0
Comparator
fertilizer-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mehlich 1-extractable P (MEP) did not differ among the CPL- and fertilizer-treated plots (averaging P at 45 mg·kg -1 soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1734 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mehlich-extractable phosphorus was lowest in controls, averaging 21 mg per kg soil.

Treatment
control plotse0
Outcome
MEPe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
21 mg·kg -1 soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MEP was lowest in control plots (averaging P at 21 mg·kg -1 soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest litter can suppress weeds without adversely affecting environmental nitrogen release.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
CPL could be used as a weed suppressante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CPL could be used as a weed suppressant without adversely affecting N release to the environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1921 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors caution that phosphorus in soil water may be problematic with litter use.

Outcome
P concentration in soil water may be problematice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P concentration in soil water may be problematic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–1980 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peach ( Prunus persica L. `Sunhigh') plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–336 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · weed · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.