Paper · 1984 · HortScience

The Effects of Oryzalin Alone and in Combination with Diuron and Simazine on Young Peach Trees

W. V. Welker

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N 4 ,N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide), simazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)- s -triazine), and diuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea) alone and combinations of oryzalin plus simazine or diuron were applied annually for 4 years to young peach ( Prunus persica L.) trees. The effectiveness of each herbicide decreased as years of use increased. Weed population shifts occurred with continuous use of the same herbicide. Herbicide combinations resulted in better weed control than did the monoherbicide treatments. Growth and yield were highly correlated with increased weed control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide effectiveness declined across years of use.

Treatment
years of usee0
Outcome
effectiveness of each herbicidee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Young Peach Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effectiveness of each herbicide decreased as years of use increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous use of the same herbicide shifted weed populations.

Treatment
continuous use of the same herbicidee0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed population shiftse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Young Peach Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weed population shifts occurred with continuous use of the same herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide combinations controlled weeds better than single-herbicide treatments.

Treatment
Herbicide combinationse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
monoherbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Young Peach Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Herbicide combinations resulted in better weed control than did the monoherbicide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–549 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach growth and yield correlated strongly with increased weed control.

Treatment
increased weed controle0
Outcome
Growth and yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Young Peach Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth and yield were highly correlated with increased weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–618 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.