Paper · 2015 · Plant Soil and Environment

Growth and photosynthesis of Upland and Pima cotton: response to drought and heat stress

V. Hejnák; Ö. Tatar; G.D. Atasoy; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
73
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effects of drought and heat stress on physiology of two common cotton species, Gossypium hirsutum L. (Upland) and G. barbadense L. (Pima) were investigated in this study. Four consecutive 28-day pot experiments were carried out in a fully controlled growth chamber under four temperatures (25, 30, 35 and 40°C), while two water treatments (well-watered and drought) were imposed for 10 days to both cotton species. Growth according to dry matter accumulation of G. barbadense was more limited by sole drought conditions (50%), whereas heat stress was more remarkable on growth of G. hirsutum (64%). Chlorophyll (Chl) a and b content were more temperature-sensitive in G. hirsutum than G. barbadense under well-watered conditions. The most noticeable decrease in drought-induced rates of photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) were recorded under 35°C, although genotypic variation was found under 25°C. Higher water use efficiency was associated with higher temperature. Relative decrease in Chl a content, gs and maximal quantum efficiency of PSII exhibited by both species were distinctive physiological traits for heat and drought tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought limited G. barbadense dry matter growth by 50%.

Taxon
G. barbadenseGossypium barbadensee0
Treatment
sole drought conditionse0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
more limitede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth according to dry matter accumulation of G. barbadense was more limited by sole drought conditions (50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress limited G. hirsutum growth by 64%.

Taxon
G. hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
more remarkablee0
Value
64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat stress was more remarkable on growth of G. hirsutum (64%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–601 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and b content was more temperature sensitive in G. hirsutum than G. barbadense when well watered.

Taxon
G. hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
well-watered conditionse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll (Chl) a and b contente0
Direction
more temperature-sensitivee0
Comparator
G. barbadensee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll (Chl) a and b content were more temperature-sensitive in G. hirsutum than G. barbadense under well-watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought induced decreases in photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance were most pronounced at 35°C.

Treatment
drought-inducede0
Outcome
photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
35°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most noticeable decrease in drought-induced rates of photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) were recorded under 35°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic variation in drought responses was found at 25°C.

Outcome
genotypic variatione0
Setting
25°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypic variation was found under 25°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher water use efficiency was associated with higher temperature.

Treatment
higher temperaturee0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
Highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher water use efficiency was associated with higher temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative decreases in chlorophyll a, stomatal conductance and maximal PSII quantum efficiency were distinctive heat and drought tolerance traits in both species.

Treatment
heat and droughte0
Outcome
Chl a content, gs and maximal quantum efficiency of PSIIe0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
heat and drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative decrease in Chl a content, gs and maximal quantum efficiency of PSII exhibited by both species were distinctive physiological traits for heat and drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 4 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 7 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

drought · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.