Paper · 2012 · HortScience

Crop Coefficient-based Deficit Irrigation and Planting Density for Onion: Growth, Yield, and Bulb Quality

Daniel I. Leskovar; Shinsuke Agehara; Kilsun Yoo; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
38
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Agricultural communities in the semiarid regions of the world are constantly being affected by water scarcity, increased regulations restricting water use, strong competition for irrigation water with the urban sector, and severe drought periods. Conversely, the consumer demand for high-quality and nutritious foods is increasing rapidly. A 2-year field study evaluated growth, yield, and bulb quality in response to precision planting density and deficit irrigation of onion ( Allium cepa L.) in southwest Texas. Seeds of short-day sweet onion cv. Texas Grano 1015Y were planted in the field on 11 Nov. 2007 and 30 Oct. 2008 at two planting densities (PDs), 397,000 (standard) and 484,000 (high) seeds/ha. Three irrigation rates using growth stage-specific crop coefficients and subsurface drip were imposed after plants were fully established, 100%, 75%, and 50% crop evapotranspiration rates (ETc). Total rainfall plus irrigation received for each irrigation rate were 594, 501, and 413 mm in 2008 and 662, 574, and 486 mm in 2009. In both seasons, there were consistent trends in growth, yield, and quality parameters. Leaf fresh weight was unaffected by PD but was reduced by deficit irrigation at 50% ETc. Although increasing planting density reduced the average bulb size by 12%, it increased the number of marketable bulbs by 21% to 33% and marketable yield by 7% to 14%. In contrast, deficit irrigation showed a trend to reduce both the number of bulbs and bulb size with yield reductions of 8% to 13% at 75% ETc and 19% to 27% at 50% ETc. Neither planting density nor deficit irrigation rate had a significant effect on soluble solids content, pungency, or quercetin contents. These results suggest that growers of short-day onions in semiarid regions could adjust PDs to target high-value bulb sizes. Implementing water-conserving practices (deficit irrigation at 75% ETc rate) would result in a decrease of high-value bulb grades and modest losses in yield but not flavor or nutritional components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density did not significantly affect leaf fresh weight.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
PDe0
Outcome
Leaf fresh weighte0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf fresh weight was unaffected by PD but was reduced by deficit irrigation at 50% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 50% ETc reduced leaf fresh weight.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
deficit irrigation at 50% ETce0
Outcome
Leaf fresh weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf fresh weight was unaffected by PD but was reduced by deficit irrigation at 50% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density reduced average bulb size by 12%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
increasing planting densitye0
Outcome
average bulb sizee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing planting density reduced the average bulb size by 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density increased marketable bulb number by 21% to 33%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
number of marketable bulbse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21% to 33%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the number of marketable bulbs by 21% to 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher planting density increased marketable yield by 7% to 14%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7% to 14%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the number of marketable bulbs by 21% to 33% and marketable yield by 7% to 14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation tended to reduce bulb number and bulb size.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
number of bulbs and bulb sizee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation showed a trend to reduce both the number of bulbs and bulb size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75% ETc, yield fell by 8% to 13%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
75% ETce0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
8% to 13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield reductions of 8% to 13% at 75% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% ETc, yield fell by 19% to 27%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
50% ETce0
Value
19% to 27%e0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“19% to 27% at 50% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density and deficit irrigation had no significant effect on soluble solids, pungency or quercetin.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
soluble solids content, pungency, or quercetin contentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither planting density nor deficit irrigation rate had a significant effect on soluble solids content, pungency, or quercetin contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers could adjust planting densities to target high-value bulb sizes.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
adjust PDs to target high-value bulb sizese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growers of short-day onions in semiarid regions could adjust PDs to target high-value bulb sizes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 75% ETc irrigation would reduce high-value grades and modestly reduce yield while preserving flavor and nutrition.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
deficit irrigation at 75% ETc ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation at 75% ETc rate) would result in a decrease of high-value bulb grades and modest losses in yield but not flavor or nutritional components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–2010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑

density · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 35 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 106 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.