Paper · 2016 · Ornamental Horticulture

Influência de ácido indolbutírico no enraizamento de estacas semilenhosas de Campomanesia aurea

Aquélis Armiliato Emer; Gilmar Schafer; Eduarda Demari Avrella; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil, naturally occurring from the state of São Paulo to Rio Grande do Sul, and presenting a great ornamental potential. The objective was to verify the rooting of semihardwood cuttings of Campomanesia aurea using indolebutyric acid (IBA) doses. The cuttings were collected in the municipality of Barão do Triunfo, Rio Grande do Sul State, in December 2014. The cutting base was immersed in concentrations of zero (control), 2,000, 4,000, 6,000 and 8,000 mg L-1 of IBA, subsequently established in a carbonized rice husk substrate and placed in a protected environment with an intermittent misting system. At 111 days after installation, dead and rooted cuttings, leaf retention, callus formation, root volume, root and shoot dry matter were evaluated. The experimental design was completely randomized with four replications with 20 cuttings. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and regression. No statistical differences were found for any of the evaluations. An average rooting was observed in 28% of cuttings and callus formation was observed in 48% of cuttings. Root average volume per cutting was 0.15 mL, root dry mass was 0.01 g, and shoot dry mass was 0.28 g. There was a negative correlation between leaf retention and mortality of cuttings. It is concluded that the production of C. aurea by cutting is viable, and that there was no positive response to the application of IBA with the conditions under which the experiment was developed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An average rooting of 28% was observed in cuttings of Campomanesia aurea.

Taxon
Campomanesia aureaCampomanesia aureae0
Organ / stage
cuttingse1
Outcome
rootinge1
Value
28%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“An average rooting was observed in 28% of cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus formation was observed in 48% of Campomanesia aurea cuttings.

Taxon
Campomanesia aureaCampomanesia aureae0
Organ / stage
cuttingse2
Outcome
callus formatione2
Value
48%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“callus formation was observed in 48% of cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root average volume per cutting of Campomanesia aurea was 0.15 mL.

Taxon
Campomanesia aureaCampomanesia aureae0
Organ / stage
Roote4
Outcome
root average volume per cuttinge4
Value
0.15 mLe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“Root average volume per cutting was 0.15 mL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry mass of Campomanesia aurea cuttings was 0.01 g.

Taxon
Campomanesia aureaCampomanesia aureae0
Organ / stage
roote5
Outcome
root dry masse5
Value
0.01 ge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e5

“root dry mass was 0.01 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry mass of Campomanesia aurea cuttings was 0.28 g.

Taxon
Campomanesia aureaCampomanesia aureae0
Organ / stage
shoote6
Outcome
shoot dry masse6
Value
0.28 ge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e6

“shoot dry mass was 0.28 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1238 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf retention was negatively correlated with mortality of Campomanesia aurea cuttings.

Taxon
Campomanesia aureaCampomanesia aureae0
Organ / stage
leafe7
Outcome
mortality of cuttingse7
Direction
negativee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was a negative correlation between leaf retention and mortality of cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1321 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting propagation of Campomanesia aurea is viable.

Outcome
production of C. aurea by cuttinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“It is concluded that the production of C. aurea by cutting is viable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA doses of 2,000 to 8,000 mg L-1 gave no significant difference in any cutting evaluation or positive response compared with the zero control.

Taxon
Campomanesia aureaCampomanesia aureae0
Treatment
IBAe4
Outcome
any of the evaluationse5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
zero (control)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campomanesia aurea
Campomanesia aurea · TaxonEdson Luis Fabro Gasperin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Campomanesia aurea (O. Berg) is a species native to southern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“The cutting base was immersed in concentrations of zero (control), 2,000, 4,000, 6,000 and 8,000 mg L-1 of IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–531 · show in text ↑
e5

“No statistical differences were found for any of the evaluations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1031 · show in text ↑
e6

“there was no positive response to the application of IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1458 · show in text ↑