Paper · 2015 · Food Science and Technology

Postharvest UV-B treatments increased fructose content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L. cv. Tayfun F1) harvested at different ripening stages

Mehmet Ufuk KASIM; Rezzan KASIM

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the postharvest stage, taste and flavor are the key components of the marketability of tomato. Therefore, greater emphasis is now being placed on improving traits such as sugar content. In this study postharvest ultraviolet-B (UV-B) treatments on sugar, total soluble solids, and color of tomatoes harvested at different stages were investigated. Tomatoes harvested at turning, pink, and red stages were treated with two different doses of UV-B irradiation: UVB4 and UVB8. Color L* and hue angle values of tomatoes treated with UV-B were found to be high, which means the red color of tomatoes was improved. UVB4 treatments increased the color a* and saturation index values of tomatoes at pink and red harvest stage, although it did not affect at the turning stage. Additionally, UV-B irradiation treatments had no effect on sucrose content of the tomatoes. Fructose, glucose, and TSS content of tomatoes treated with UVB8 at red harvest stage were found to be high. Hence, the results obtained from this study are of great importance in terms of providing an increase in the amount of sugar without the need for breeding, and also consumer satisfaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B treated tomatoes had high color L* and hue angle values.

Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
Color L* and hue angle valuese0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Color L* and hue angle values of tomatoes treated with UV-B were found to be high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L. cv. Tayfun F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB4 increased color a* and saturation at pink and red harvest stages.

Organ / stage
pink and red harvest stagee0
Treatment
UVB4e0
Outcome
color a* and saturation index valuese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UVB4 treatments increased the color a* and saturation index values of tomatoes at pink and red harvest stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L. cv. Tayfun F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB4 did not affect those color indices at turning stage.

Organ / stage
turning stagee0
Outcome
color a* and saturation index valuese1
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although it did not affect at the turning stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“the color a* and saturation index values of tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L. cv. Tayfun F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B did not affect tomato sucrose content.

Treatment
UV-B irradiation treatmentse0
Outcome
sucrose contente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B irradiation treatments had no effect on sucrose content of the tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L. cv. Tayfun F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB8 treated red-stage tomatoes had high fructose, glucose and TSS content.

Organ / stage
red harvest stagee0
Treatment
UVB8e0
Outcome
Fructose, glucose, and TSS contente0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fructose, glucose, and TSS content of tomatoes treated with UVB8 at red harvest stage were found to be high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L. cv. Tayfun F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–104 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

uv · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

radiation · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.