Paper · 2024 · Photonic Technologies in Plant and Agricultural Science

Evaluation of far-UVC 222 nm in the decontamination and increase of shelf life of fruits

Fernanda Alves; Mariana Mayumiyamashiro Mayumi; Thaila Quatrini Corrêa; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Currently, ultraviolet-C (UV-C) has been used in food decontamination, representing an alternative to traditional strategies that are potentially harmful to the physical-chemical aspects of the food and the environment. This study evaluated the effectiveness of UV-C at 222 nm in the decontamination of tomatoes inoculated with Escherichia coli, and verified whether there is an extension of their shelf life, after treatments with light doses of 0; 0.90 ± 0.02; 1.70 ± 0.02; 3.40 ± 0.02; 7.0 ± 0.1; 14.0 ± 0.3; 27.5 ± 0.4 mJ/cm2. After applying UV-C light, a microbiological evaluation was done by counting viable colonies. In addition, physical analyses were performed. For this, the irradiated samples were kept in an incubator at 25 °C for 14 days; then, the colorimetric parameters, pH, and weight were quantified daily immediately after the irradiation cycle and at the end of the 14 days of observation. The microbiological results reaffirmed the effectiveness of UV-C 222 nm in surface decontamination of food. From the results of the microbiological analyzes, good decontamination values were obtained using the light dose of 3.40 ± 0.04 mJ/cm2 , with a reduction greater than four log. However, physical analyses did not identify a significant extension in shelf life, which also infers the absence of damage or physical impairment to the fruit development. In conclusion, UV-C at 222 nm effectively inactivates E. coli present on the surface of tomatoes without altering their physical characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 3.40 ± 0.04 mJ/cm2 reduced surface microbial counts by more than four log.

Treatment
light dose of 3.40 ± 0.04 mJ/cm2e0
Interactor
Escherichia coliEscherichia colit0pathogen
Outcome
decontamination valuese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
greater than four loge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · InteractorNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“good decontamination values were obtained using the light dose of 3.40 ± 0.04 mJ/cm2 , with a reduction greater than four log.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“decontamination of tomatoes inoculated with Escherichia coli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C did not significantly extend tomato shelf life.

Treatment
UV-Ce1
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
did not identify a significant extensione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“physical analyses did not identify a significant extension in shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“far-UVC 222 nm in the decontamination and increase of shelf life of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C at 222 nm effectively inactivates E. coli present on the surface of tomatoes without altering their physical characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 222 nm inactivated E. coli on tomatoes without changing their physical characteristics.

Treatment
UV-C at 222 nme0
Interactor
E. coliEscherichia colie0pathogen
Outcome
E. coli present on the surface of tomatoese0
Direction
inactivatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · InteractorNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C at 222 nm effectively inactivates E. coli present on the surface of tomatoes without altering their physical characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C did not alter tomato physical characteristics.

Treatment
UV-C at 222 nme0
Outcome
physical characteristicse0
Direction
without alteringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C at 222 nm effectively inactivates E. coli present on the surface of tomatoes without altering their physical characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1513 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.