Paper · 2016 · Eurasian Soil Science

Transformation of soil organic matter in leached chernozems under minimized treatment in the forest-steppe of West Siberia

I. N. Sharkov; L. M. Samokhvalova; P. V. Mishina

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Changes in the contents of total organic carbon and the carbon of easily mineralizable fractions of organic matter (labile humus, detritus, and mortmass) in the layers of 0–10, 10–25, and 0–25 cm were studied in leached chernozems ((Luvic Chernozems (Loamic, Aric)) subjected to deep plowing and surface tillage for nine years. In the layer of 0–25 cm, the content of Corg did not show significant difference between these two treatments and comprised 3.68–3.92% in the case of deep plowing and 3.63–4.08% in the case of surface tillage. Tillage practices greatly affected the distribution of easily mineralizable fractions of organic matter in the layers of 0–10 and 10–25 cm, though the difference between two treatments for the entire layer (0–25 cm) was insignificant. Surface tillage resulted in the increase in the contents of mortmass (by 59%), detritus (by 32%), and labile humus (by 8%) in the layer of 0–10 cm in comparison with deep plowing. At the same time, the contents of these fractions in the layer of 10–25 cm in the surface tillage treatment decreased by 67, 46, and 3%, respectively. The estimate of the nitrogen-mineralizing capacity made according to the data on the uptake of soil nitrogen by oat plants in a special greenhouse experiment confirmed the observed regularities of the redistribution of easily mineralizable organic matter fractions by the soil layers. In case of surface tillage, it increased by 23% in the layer of 0–10 cm; for the layer of 0–25 cm, no significant differences in the uptake of nitrogen by oat plants were found for the two studied treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under surface tillage, oat nitrogen uptake increased by 23% in the 0–10 cm layer.

Taxon
oat plantsAvena sativae0
Treatment
surface tillagee1
Outcome
uptake of soil nitrogen by oat plantse0
Direction
increasede1
Value
23%e1
Setting
greenhouse experimente0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uptake of soil nitrogen by oat plants in a special greenhouse experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1261 · show in text ↑
e1

“In case of surface tillage, it increased by 23% in the layer of 0–10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat nitrogen uptake in the 0–25 cm layer did not differ significantly between the two tillage treatments.

Taxon
oat plantsAvena sativae0
Treatment
surface tillagee1
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen by oat plantse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
layer of 0–25 cme0
Comparator
deep plowinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the layer of 0–25 cm, no significant differences in the uptake of nitrogen by oat plants were found for the two studied treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“In case of surface tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1415 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to deep plowing and surface tillage for nine years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–326 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.