Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Rabi, 2011-12 to study the effect of tillage practices and nutrient management on growth, fodder yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.).The treatments comprised of zero tillage, minimal tillage and conventional tillage in main plots and 75 per cent RDF, 75 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers, 100 per cent RDF, 100 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers in sub plots.Biofertilizers are Azotobacter and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria.Highest green and dry fodder yields were recorded in the plots treated with conventional tillage.Highest net available soil nutrients were recorded under plots treated with conventional tillage.In case of nutrient management highest green fodder and dry fodder yields and highest net available soil nutrients were recorded in the plots treated with 100 per cent RDF + biofertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave the highest green and dry fodder yields of oat.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- conventional tillagee2
- Outcome
- green and dry fodder yieldse2
- Direction
- Higheste2
- Comparator
- zero tillage, minimal tillagee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Yield of fodder oat”
e2“Highest green and dry fodder yields were recorded in the plots treated with conventional tillage”
e3“The treatments comprised of zero tillage, minimal tillage and conventional tillage in main plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave the highest net available soil nutrients.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee4
- Outcome
- net available soil nutrientse4
- Direction
- Higheste4
- Comparator
- zero tillage, minimal tillagee3
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e3“The treatments comprised of zero tillage, minimal tillage and conventional tillage in main plots”
e4“Highest net available soil nutrients were recorded under plots treated with conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
100 per cent RDF with biofertilizers gave the highest green and dry fodder yields of oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + biofertilizerse5
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere5symbiont - Second interactor
- PSBe5symbiont
- Outcome
- green fodder and dry fodder yieldse5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Comparator
- 75 per cent RDF, 75 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers, 100 per cent RDFe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Yield of fodder oat”
e5“In case of nutrient management highest green fodder and dry fodder yields and highest net available soil nutrients were recorded in the plots treated with 100 per cent RDF + biofertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB)”
e6“75 per cent RDF, 75 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers, 100 per cent RDF, 100 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers in sub plots”
Claim · model-written summary
100 per cent RDF with biofertilizers gave the highest net available soil nutrients.
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF + biofertilizerse5
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere5symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe5symbiont
- Outcome
- net available soil nutrientse5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Comparator
- 75 per cent RDF, 75 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers, 100 per cent RDFe6
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“In case of nutrient management highest green fodder and dry fodder yields and highest net available soil nutrients were recorded in the plots treated with 100 per cent RDF + biofertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB)”
e6“75 per cent RDF, 75 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers, 100 per cent RDF, 100 per cent RDF + bio-fertilizers in sub plots”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.