Paper · 2016 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Red sorrel management and potential effect of red sorrel pollen on Botrytis cinerea spore germination and infection of lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) flowers

Angela Hughes; Scott N. White; Nathan S. Boyd; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Red sorrel is a common weed in lowbush blueberry fields in Nova Scotia, Canada. Grower experience suggests that high red sorrel density necessitates fungicide applications to control Botrytis cinerea, a major fungal pathogen in lowbush blueberry. Specific interactions between red sorrel, lowbush blueberry, and B. cinerea, however, remain unclear. Experiments were conducted in Nova Scotia to determine the (1) presence or absence of red sorrel pollen on lowbush blueberry flowers in the field, (2) impact of red sorrel pollen on in vitro B. cinerea spore germination and infection of immature and mature blueberry flowers, and (3) effect of pronamide applications on red sorrel and lowbush blueberry growth. Red sorrel pollen grains were found on blueberry flowers in the field. In vitro B. cinerea spore germination increased with increasing red sorrel pollen concentration, with the relationship adequately explained by a 3-parameter exponential rise to a maximum equation. Red sorrel pollen increased B. cinerea disease incidence on immature, but not mature, blueberry flowers in the greenhouse. Pronamide applications reduced red sorrel density in three out of four site years, but did not reduce red sorrel biomass or increase harvestable blueberry yield. Red sorrel pollen may increase B. cinerea disease incidence in lowbush blueberry, and growers should expect variable results when using pronamide for red sorrel management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red sorrel pollen occurred on blueberry flowers in the field.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Organ / stage
flowerse0
Interactor
Red sorrelHibiscus sabdariffae0weed
Outcome
pollen grains were found on blueberry flowerse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · InteractorInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red sorrel pollen grains were found on blueberry flowers in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–779 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis spore germination increased with red sorrel pollen concentration.

Taxon
lowbush blueberryVaccinium angustifoliumt0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
red sorrelHibiscus sabdariffae0weed
Outcome
B. cinerea spore germinatione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium angustifolium
Vaccinium angustifolium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · Second interactorInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro B. cinerea spore germination increased with increasing red sorrel pollen concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“lowbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An exponential rise to a maximum equation adequately explained the pollen concentration and spore germination relationship.

Taxon
lowbush blueberryVaccinium angustifoliumt0
Outcome
relationship adequately explainede0
Value
3-parametere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium angustifolium
Vaccinium angustifolium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relationship adequately explained by a 3-parameter exponential rise to a maximum equation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“lowbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red sorrel pollen increased Botrytis disease incidence on immature blueberry flowers.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Organ / stage
immaturee0
Treatment
Red sorrel pollene0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
Red sorrelHibiscus sabdariffae0weed
Outcome
B. cinerea disease incidencee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
maturee0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · Second interactorInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red sorrel pollen increased B. cinerea disease incidence on immature, but not mature, blueberry flowers in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red sorrel pollen did not increase Botrytis disease incidence on mature blueberry flowers.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Organ / stage
maturee0
Treatment
Red sorrel pollene0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
Red sorrelHibiscus sabdariffae0weed
Outcome
B. cinerea disease incidencee0
Direction
not maturee0
Comparator
immaturee0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · Second interactorInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red sorrel pollen increased B. cinerea disease incidence on immature, but not mature, blueberry flowers in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronamide reduced red sorrel density in three of four site years.

Taxon
lowbush blueberryVaccinium angustifoliumt0
Treatment
Pronamide applicationse0
Interactor
red sorrelHibiscus sabdariffae0weed
Outcome
red sorrel densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
three out of four site yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium angustifolium
Vaccinium angustifolium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · InteractorInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pronamide applications reduced red sorrel density in three out of four site years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“lowbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronamide did not reduce red sorrel biomass.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
Pronamide applicationse0
Interactor
red sorrelHibiscus sabdariffae0weed
Outcome
red sorrel biomasse0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · InteractorInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pronamide applications reduced red sorrel density in three out of four site years, but did not reduce red sorrel biomass or increase harvestable blueberry yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronamide did not increase harvestable blueberry yield.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Treatment
Pronamide applicationse0
Outcome
harvestable blueberry yielde0
Direction
did not reduce red sorrel biomass or increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pronamide applications reduced red sorrel density in three out of four site years, but did not reduce red sorrel biomass or increase harvestable blueberry yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1261 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers should expect variable results from pronamide for red sorrel management.

Taxon
lowbush blueberryVaccinium angustifoliumt0
Outcome
variable results when using pronamide for red sorrel managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium angustifolium
Vaccinium angustifolium · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growers should expect variable results when using pronamide for red sorrel management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“lowbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑

propyzamide · yield · VacciniumResults differ

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

propyzamide · Hibiscus sabdariffa · Vaccinium angustifolium (lowbush blueberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.