Paper · 2015 · Journal of Crop Nutrition Science

Evaluation of Sulfur Fertilizer on Canola Yield under Salinity Conditions

Alireza Jafarnejadi; Hamed Rezaei; A Naderi

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil and water salinity damage and decrease canola yield. However, plant yield should be increased using effective methods. This study aimed at investigating the effect of sulfure application fertilizers on canola yield. To this end, the experiment was conducted in split plot arrangement based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications at Shavoor Research Station in south west of Iran. Main plots was the source of sulfur fertilizer (sulfur element, gypsum, sulfuric acid, golden bio-sulfur) and sub plots were the rate of sulfur application including 6 levels (0, 50, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 Kg S.ha -1 ). Results showed sources and rate that of sulfur fertilizers had significant different effects (p<0.01) on canola yield and biologic yield but they had no effect on grain thousand weight and grain in capsule. The highest grain yield and biologic yield obtained from Golden bio sulfur application. The findings also revealed that Interactive effects had significant effects (p<0.01) on canola yield and biologic yield but they had no effects on grain thou-sand weight and grain in capsule. Sulfur fertilizer application is an effective method for compensation damage yield of canola in salinity conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilizer sources and rates significantly affected canola yield and biologic yield.

Treatment
sulfur fertilizerse1
Outcome
canola yielde1
Qualifier
p<0.01e1
Setting
Shavoor Research Statione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola Yield under Salinity Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“at Shavoor Research Station in south west of Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–405 · show in text ↑
e1

“sources and rate that of sulfur fertilizers had significant different effects (p<0.01) on canola yield and biologic yield but they had no effect on grain thousand weight and grain in capsule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilizers had no effect on grain thousand weight and grain in capsule of canola.

Treatment
sulfur fertilizerse1
Outcome
grain thousand weight and grain in capsulee1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola Yield under Salinity Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“sources and rate that of sulfur fertilizers had significant different effects (p<0.01) on canola yield and biologic yield but they had no effect on grain thousand weight and grain in capsule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden bio sulfur application gave the highest grain yield and biologic yield of canola.

Treatment
Golden bio sulfur applicatione2
Outcome
grain yield and biologic yielde2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola Yield under Salinity Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest grain yield and biologic yield obtained from Golden bio sulfur application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–919 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactive effects of sulfur source and rate were significant for canola yield and biologic yield.

Treatment
Interactive effectse3
Outcome
canola yield and biologic yielde3
Qualifier
p<0.01e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola Yield under Salinity Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“Interactive effects had significant effects (p<0.01) on canola yield and biologic yield but they had no effects on grain thou-sand weight and grain in capsule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactive effects of sulfur source and rate had no effect on grain thousand weight and grain in capsule of canola.

Treatment
Interactive effectse3
Outcome
grain thou-sand weight and grain in capsulee3
Direction
no effectse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola Yield under Salinity Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“Interactive effects had significant effects (p<0.01) on canola yield and biologic yield but they had no effects on grain thou-sand weight and grain in capsule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1111 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilizer application is an effective way to compensate canola yield damage under salinity.

Treatment
Sulfur fertilizer applicatione4
Outcome
compensation damage yielde4
Qualifier
salinity conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola Yield under Salinity Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sulfur fertilizer application is an effective method for compensation damage yield of canola in salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1228 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.