Abstract
Field experiments conducted over three years at Stoneville, MS evaluated invert emulsion and oil diluents on the efficiacy of glyphosate and MSMA on purple nutsedge. The herbicides were applied at 0.6 and 1.1 kg ai/ha in an invert emulsion (oil-in-water) and a paraffinic oil at 19 L/ha (low-volume) and in water with a non-ionic surfactant (0.25% v/v) at 187 L/ha (high-volume). Purple nutsedge control with both herbicides was greater with the low-volume, invert emulsion and oil diluent applications than with high-volume, water diluent applications. Glyphosate and MSMA at 1.1 kg/ha in the oil diluent controlled purple nutsedge at least 88% when compared with the invert emulsion (≥ 75 and ≥ 76%, respectively) and water (≥ 42 and ≥ 44%, respectively) diluents. Cotton injury and seed cotton yields were unaffected by any treatment with MSMA but glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury and seed cotton yield reduction.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Low-volume invert emulsion gave greater nutsedge control than high-volume water with both herbicides.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- low-volume, invert emulsione0
- Interactor
- purple nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- Purple nutsedge controle0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- high-volume, water diluent applicationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Purple nutsedge control with both herbicides was greater with the low-volume, invert emulsion and oil diluent applications than with high-volume, water diluent applications”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Low-volume oil diluent gave greater nutsedge control than high-volume water.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- oil diluent applicationse0
- Interactor
- purple nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- Purple nutsedge controle0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- high-volume, water diluent applicationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Purple nutsedge control with both herbicides was greater with the low-volume, invert emulsion and oil diluent applications than with high-volume, water diluent applications”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate in oil controlled nutsedge at least 88%.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Glyphosatee0
- Interactor
- purple nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- purple nutsedgee0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 88%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glyphosate and MSMA at 1.1 kg/ha in the oil diluent controlled purple nutsedge at least 88%”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
MSMA in oil controlled nutsedge at least 88%.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- MSMAe0
- Interactor
- purple nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- purple nutsedgee0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 88%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glyphosate and MSMA at 1.1 kg/ha in the oil diluent controlled purple nutsedge at least 88%”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
MSMA treatments did not affect cotton injury.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- MSMAe0
- Outcome
- Cotton injurye0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cotton injury and seed cotton yields were unaffected by any treatment with MSMA”
Claim · model-written summary
MSMA treatments did not affect seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- MSMAe0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yieldse0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cotton injury and seed cotton yields were unaffected by any treatment with MSMA”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- glyphosate with each diluente0
- Outcome
- cotton injurye0
- Direction
- causede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury and seed cotton yield reduction”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate with each diluent reduced seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- glyphosate with each diluente0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury and seed cotton yield reduction”
t0“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →glyphosate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.