Paper · 2009 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Allelopathic Crop Water Extracts Reduce the Herbicide Dose for Weed Control in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Javaid Iqbal; Z. A. Cheema; Muhammad Naeem Mushtaq

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop allelopathy can be manipulated for achieving sustainable weed management. Less inhibition of weeds is generally achieved through allelopathic interactions than the standard weed control limits. Combination of allelopathic crop water extracts with lower rate of herbicides may provide lower desired weed control levels there by reducing herbicide usage. Two field studies were conducted utilizing water extracts of allelopathic crops sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and brassica (Brassica napus L.) with reduced glyphosate dosage for controlling purple nutsedge in cotton. In first experiment sorghum and brassica water extracts were tank mixed (at 15 & 18 L ha -1 ) in different combinations with reduced rate of glyphosate by 767 and 575 g a.e. ha -1 and sprayed as directed post emergence at 21 days after sowing (DAS). In second experiment sorghum and sunflower water extracts were mixed with glyphosate at same dose as in experiment 1. Purple nutsedge density and dry weight were suppressed by 78% to 95% and 83% to 95% respectively, when different crop water extracts were used in combination with reduced rate of glyphosate. Seed cotton yield was improved from 15-21% in sorgaab and brassica water extract combinations with reduced rates of glyphosate (67-75%). However, the yield improvement in the combination of sorgaab and sunflower water extracts was comparatively less (13-19%) with similar reduction in herbicides dose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract and reduced glyphosate combinations suppressed purple nutsedge density by 78% to 95%.

Treatment
different crop water extracts were used in combination with reduced rate of glyphosatee0
Interactor
Purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Purple nutsedge densitye0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
78% to 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Purple nutsedge density and dry weight were suppressed by 78% to 95% and 83% to 95% respectively, when different crop water extracts were used in combination with reduced rate of glyphosate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract and reduced glyphosate combinations suppressed purple nutsedge dry weight by 83% to 95%.

Treatment
different crop water extracts were used in combination with reduced rate of glyphosatee0
Interactor
Purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Purple nutsedge density and dry weighte0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
83% to 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Purple nutsedge density and dry weight were suppressed by 78% to 95% and 83% to 95% respectively, when different crop water extracts were used in combination with reduced rate of glyphosate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorgaab and brassica extracts with reduced glyphosate improved seed cotton yield by 15-21%.

Treatment
sorgaab and brassica water extract combinations with reduced rates of glyphosatee0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
15-21%e0
Qualifier
67-75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield was improved from 15-21% in sorgaab and brassica water extract combinations with reduced rates of glyphosate (67-75%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorgaab and sunflower extracts with reduced glyphosate improved seed cotton yield by 13-19%.

Treatment
combination of sorgaab and sunflower water extractse0
Outcome
yield improvemente0
Direction
comparatively lesse0
Value
13-19%e0
Qualifier
similar reduction in herbicides dosee0
Comparator
sorgaab and brassica water extract combinationst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield improvement in the combination of sorgaab and sunflower water extracts was comparatively less (13-19%) with similar reduction in herbicides dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
t1

“sorgaab and brassica water extract combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1260 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

botanical · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

botanical · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 21 positive, 22 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.