Paper · 2004 · Weed Science

Response of nonglyphosate-resistant cotton to reduced rates of glyphosate

Donnie K. Miller; Robert G. Downer; B. Roger Leonard; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field research was conducted in 1999 and 2000 to determine the effect of reduced glyphosate rates on growth and yield of nonglyphosate-resistant cotton. Rates of 9, 18, 35, 70, 140, and 280 g ha −1 , representing 0.008, 0.016, 0.031 0.063, 0.125, and 0.25, respectively, of the maximum use rate per application (1,120 g ha −1 ), were applied to cotton at the two-, five-, or nine-node growth stage. On the basis of visual injury estimates, cotton was more tolerant to glyphosate at the nine-node than at earlier growth stages. Plant dry weight was reduced with 70 g ha −1 of glyphosate or higher, when applied at the two- and five-node growth stages in two of three experiments. Dry weight was not affected by glyphosate at the nine-node stage. Plant height also was unaffected by glyphosate rates below 70 g ha −1 , but height reduction was noted for all growth stages by experiment combinations, with the exception of the nine-node application for both experiments in 2000, with herbicide rates of 70 g ha −1 or higher. Cotton maturity delay, as noted by an increase in node above white flower number, was observed only at the highest glyphosate rate applied to two- and five-node cotton in one of three experiments. Percent open boll data analysis indicated a decreased opportunity of observing an open boll with increasing glyphosate rate, and this effect was greater at the five-node compared with the two- and nine-node stages in two of three experiments. Seedcotton yield after all glyphosate applications was equivalent to that for the nontreated control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton was more tolerant of glyphosate at nine nodes than earlier stages.

Organ / stage
nine-nodee0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
tolerant to glyphosatee0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
earlier growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton was more tolerant to glyphosate at the nine-node than at earlier growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 70 g ha −1 or higher reduced cotton dry weight at two and five nodes in two of three experiments.

Organ / stage
two- and five-node growth stagese0
Treatment
70 g ha −1 of glyphosate or highere0
Outcome
Plant dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
two of three experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant dry weight was reduced with 70 g ha −1 of glyphosate or higher, when applied at the two- and five-node growth stages in two of three experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate did not affect cotton dry weight at nine nodes.

Organ / stage
nine-node stagee0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
Dry weighte0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dry weight was not affected by glyphosate at the nine-node stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate rates below 70 g ha −1 did not affect cotton height.

Treatment
glyphosate rates below 70 g ha −1e0
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height also was unaffected by glyphosate rates below 70 g ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate rates of 70 g ha −1 or higher reduced cotton height except at nine nodes in 2000.

Treatment
herbicide rates of 70 g ha −1 or highere0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
with the exception of the nine-node application for both experiments in 2000e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“height reduction was noted for all growth stages by experiment combinations, with the exception of the nine-node application for both experiments in 2000, with herbicide rates of 70 g ha −1 or higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest glyphosate rate delayed cotton maturity at two and five nodes in one experiment.

Organ / stage
two- and five-node cottone0
Treatment
highest glyphosate ratee0
Outcome
Cotton maturity delaye0
Direction
delaye0
Qualifier
one of three experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton maturity delay, as noted by an increase in node above white flower number, was observed only at the highest glyphosate rate applied to two- and five-node cotton in one of three experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing glyphosate rate reduced the chance of observing an open cotton boll.

Treatment
increasing glyphosate ratee0
Outcome
opportunity of observing an open bolle0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Percent open boll data analysis indicated a decreased opportunity of observing an open boll with increasing glyphosate rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The open boll response was greater at five nodes than two or nine nodes in two experiments.

Treatment
five-nodee0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
two of three experimentse0
Comparator
two- and nine-node stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“this effect was greater at the five-node compared with the two- and nine-node stages in two of three experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedcotton yield was equivalent to the untreated control after all glyphosate applications.

Treatment
all glyphosate applicationse0
Outcome
Seedcotton yielde0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nonglyphosate-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedcotton yield after all glyphosate applications was equivalent to that for the nontreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1563 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

glyphosate · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

glyphosate · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

35 papers: 12 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.