glyphosate · Phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
6 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
Each paper in the lists below is placed by all its claims here taken together, positive if any claim is positive. A pair compares one claim of each paper, so a paper placed on the positive side can also report a decrease or no effect.
- Yield, Quality, and Fruit Distribution in Bollgard/Roundup Ready and Bollgard II/Roundup Ready Flex Cottons (2008)
no changeBGII/RRF cotton maturity was unaffected by late glyphosate applications.
Improving Cotton Production Margins through Management Decisions and Use of New and Standard commercial Products to Improve Quality and Profits (2005)decreaseUnlabeled glyphosate reduced maturity in each irrigation system in one of three years.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Improving Cotton Production Margins through Management Decisions and Use of New and Standard commercial Products to Improve Quality and Profits (2005)
decreaseUnlabeled glyphosate reduced maturity in each irrigation system in one of three years.
Yield, Quality, and Fruit Distribution in Bollgard/Roundup Ready and Bollgard II/Roundup Ready Flex Cottons (2008)no changeLate glyphosate application did not affect BGII/RRF maturity.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 6
- negative
Response of nonglyphosate-resistant cotton to reduced rates of glyphosate · 2004
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
Effect of Pendimethalin Formulation and Application Rate on Cotton Fruit Partitioning · 2010
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.