Phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)

1. glyphosateResults differ6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. mepiquat chloridePositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
3. chloridePositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
4. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. ThripsPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. calcium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. fluometuronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. manganese atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. glufosinateResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
10. Triticum aestivumResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
11. 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. Meloidogyne incognitaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. aldicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. imazaquinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. phorateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. irrigationPositive and negative results31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationPositive and negative results18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. nitrogenPositive and negative results15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect
20. densityPositive and negative results12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect
21. sowing timePositive and negative results12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect
22. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
23. pruningPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
24. stagePositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. classPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
26. loss of functionPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
27. tillagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. transplantingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. herbicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
31. potassiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. salinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
33. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. intercroppingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
35. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
36. droughtResults agree6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect
37. transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. floodingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
40. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. shadeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.