Paper · 2005 · Weed Technology

Preemergence Herbicide and Glyphosate Effects on Seedling Diseases in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton

Joseph H. Pankey; James L. Griffin; Patrick D. Colyer; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of preemergence (PRE) herbicides metolachlor at 1,700 g ai/ha, pyrithiobac at 70 g ai/ha, or pendimethalin at 840 g ai/ha applied alone or with fluometuron at 1,300 g ai/ha and glyphosate postemergence (POST) at 840 g ai/ha on seedling diseases in glyphosate-resistant cotton. Hypocotyl disease severity both years averaged across PRE herbicide treatments was greater after glyphosate application to four-leaf cotton than cotyledon cotton. The PRE herbicide treatments, particularly those including fluometuron, increased root and hypocotyl disease ratings compared with a nontreated control, and a sequential application of glyphosate did not further increase disease severity. Greenhouse experiments using soil infested with Rhizoctonia solani confirmed findings from the field study showing that PRE herbicides can predispose cotton to greater seedling disease injury with no increased seedling disease severity associated with application of glyphosate. In the field study, glyphosate applied at cotyledon or four-leaf growth stages decreased disease severity on cotton hypocotyls both years. This inhibitory effect of glyphosate was less evident in the greenhouse study and may have been related to species of fungi present, infestation level, and differences in environmental conditions when compared with the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate applied to four-leaf cotton was associated with greater hypocotyl disease severity than application to cotyledon cotton.

Treatment
glyphosate application to four-leaf cottone0
Outcome
Hypocotyl disease severitye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
both yearse0
Comparator
cotyledon cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hypocotyl disease severity both years averaged across PRE herbicide treatments was greater after glyphosate application to four-leaf cotton than cotyledon cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence herbicides increased cotton root and hypocotyl disease ratings relative to untreated control.

Treatment
PRE herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
root and hypocotyl disease ratingse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
particularly those including fluometurone0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PRE herbicide treatments, particularly those including fluometuron, increased root and hypocotyl disease ratings compared with a nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate did not further increase seedling disease severity following preemergence herbicides.

Treatment
sequential application of glyphosatee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
did not further increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a sequential application of glyphosate did not further increase disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse experiments with Rhizoctonia solani confirmed that preemergence herbicides predisposed cotton to greater seedling disease injury.

Treatment
PRE herbicidese0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
seedling disease injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Setting
Greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments using soil infested with Rhizoctonia solani confirmed findings from the field study showing that PRE herbicides can predispose cotton to greater seedling disease injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, glyphosate at cotyledon or four-leaf stage decreased cotton hypocotyl disease severity in both years.

Treatment
glyphosate applied at cotyledon or four-leaf growth stagese0
Outcome
disease severity on cotton hypocotylse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both yearse0
Setting
field studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field study, glyphosate applied at cotyledon or four-leaf growth stages decreased disease severity on cotton hypocotyls both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1155 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inhibitory effect of glyphosate on disease was less evident in the greenhouse than the field.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
inhibitory effect of glyphosatee0
Direction
less evidente0
Comparator
fielde0
Setting
greenhouse studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This inhibitory effect of glyphosate was less evident in the greenhouse study and may have been related to species of fungi present, infestation level, and differences in environmental conditions when compared with the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

stage · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.