Paper · 1979 · Weed Science

Weed and Disease Responses to Herbicides in Single- and Double-Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

J. H. Miller; C. H. Carter; R. H. Garber; et al.

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For 3 yr, herbicide treatments of preplant trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine), postemergence diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], both herbicides, or none were superimposed on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala SJ-2′) grown on beds centered at 102 cm using a single row or two rows spaced 28 cm apart. Cotton stand, after thinning, was 5.1 plants/m in each cotton row. Herbicides controlled annual weeds regardless of planting pattern. Cultivation, without herbicides, controlled annual grass weeds much better in cotton grown in single rows than in double rows. Preplant applications of trifluralin did not influence populations of cotton plants, regardless of row pattern. Single- and double-row plots treated with trifluralin always yielded more than untreated double rows. In two of three seasons, however, single-row plots without herbicides yielded as much as those treated with trifluralin. The lower yields in the double-row cotton were associated with reduced annual grass control especially in plots not treated with trifluralin. Weed control treatments or planting patterns did not influence the occurrence of Pythium ultimum Trow or Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on cotton seedlings. The presence of Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk & Br.) Ferr. on cotton seedlings was not influenced by planting pattern but was increased by trifluralin in the third year of the study. Percentage of cotton plants with symptoms of verticillium wilt ( Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) was not influenced by weed control treatments, but the percentage of diseased plants was higher in single-row than in double-row planting patterns. We attribute this response to fewer plants per hectare in single rows compared to double rows.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides controlled annual weeds regardless of planting pattern.

Treatment
Herbicidese0
Interactor
annual weedse0weed
Outcome
annual weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides controlled annual weeds regardless of planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without herbicides, cultivation controlled annual grass weeds better in single-row than double-row cotton.

Treatment
Cultivation, without herbicidese0
Interactor
annual grass weedse0weed
Outcome
annual grass weedse0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
double rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation, without herbicides, controlled annual grass weeds much better in cotton grown in single rows than in double rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin did not influence cotton plant populations across row patterns.

Treatment
Preplant applications of trifluraline0
Outcome
populations of cotton plantse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preplant applications of trifluralin did not influence populations of cotton plants, regardless of row pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin-treated single-row plots yielded more than untreated double rows.

Treatment
trifluraline0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
Single- and double-row plotse0
Comparator
untreated double rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single- and double-row plots treated with trifluralin always yielded more than untreated double rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin-treated double-row plots yielded more than untreated double rows.

Treatment
trifluraline0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
double-row plotse0
Comparator
untreated double rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single- and double-row plots treated with trifluralin always yielded more than untreated double rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In two of three seasons, untreated single-row plots yielded as much as trifluralin-treated plots.

Treatment
without herbicidese0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
as much ase0
Qualifier
two of three seasonse0
Comparator
those treated with trifluraline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In two of three seasons, however, single-row plots without herbicides yielded as much as those treated with trifluralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower double-row yields were associated with poorer annual grass control.

Interactor
annual grasse0weed
Outcome
lower yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
especially in plots not treated with trifluraline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower yields in the double-row cotton were associated with reduced annual grass control especially in plots not treated with trifluralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments and planting patterns did not affect Pythium ultimum occurrence on cotton seedlings.

Treatment
Weed control treatments or planting patternse0
Interactor
Pythium ultimum TrowGlobisporangium ultimume0pathogen
Outcome
occurrence of Pythium ultimum Trowe0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control treatments or planting patterns did not influence the occurrence of Pythium ultimum Trow or Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments and planting patterns did not affect Rhizoctonia solani occurrence on cotton seedlings.

Treatment
Weed control treatments or planting patternse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani KühnRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on cotton seedlingse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control treatments or planting patterns did not influence the occurrence of Pythium ultimum Trow or Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern did not influence Thielaviopsis basicola presence on cotton seedlings.

Treatment
planting patterne0
Interactor
Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk & Br.) Ferr.Berkeleyomyces basicolae0pathogen
Outcome
presence of Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk & Br.) Ferr. on cotton seedlingse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Berkeleyomyces basicola
Berkeleyomyces basicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk & Br.) Ferr. on cotton seedlings was not influenced by planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin increased Thielaviopsis basicola presence on cotton seedlings in year three.

Treatment
trifluraline0
Interactor
Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk & Br.) Ferr.Berkeleyomyces basicolae0pathogen
Outcome
presence of Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk & Br.) Ferr. on cotton seedlingse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
third year of the studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Berkeleyomyces basicola
Berkeleyomyces basicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk & Br.) Ferr. on cotton seedlings was not influenced by planting pattern but was increased by trifluralin in the third year of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments did not influence the percentage of cotton plants with verticillium wilt symptoms.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
Verticillium dahliae Kleb.Verticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Outcome
Percentage of cotton plants with symptoms of verticillium wilte0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage of cotton plants with symptoms of verticillium wilt ( Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) was not influenced by weed control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentage of diseased cotton plants was higher in single-row than double-row plantings.

Treatment
single-rowe0
Outcome
percentage of diseased plantse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
double-rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of diseased plants was higher in single-row than in double-row planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1663 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–255 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed greater disease in single rows to fewer plants per hectare.

Outcome
percentage of diseased plantse1
Qualifier
fewer plants per hectare in single rows compared to double rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We attribute this response to fewer plants per hectare in single rows compared to double rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1758 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage of diseased plants was higher in single-row than in double-row planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–255 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

trifluralin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 100 positive, 8 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

herbicide · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.