Paper · 1997 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

The impact of herbicides on the interactions among cotton seedlings, Rhizoctonia solani, fungicides and biocontrol bacteria

Asghar Heydari

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The impact of three pre-plant herbicides, pendimethalin, prometryn and trifluralin on the incidence and the development of Rhizoctonia solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off, on biocontrol activity of Burkholderia cepacia against R. solani, and on the efficacy of commonly used fungicides (metalaxyl, triadimenol, thiram) against R. solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off was investigated in the microcosm and in the field. In the microcosm experiments, pendimethalin, prometryn and trifluralin were applied to the soil at 2.4, 3.6 and 1.8 μg a.i. g⁻¹ soil, respectively (equivalent to the respective recommended field concentrations of 0.9, 1.3 and 0.7 kg a.i. ha⁻¹ In the microcosm experiments application of prometryn, to the soil caused a significant (P < 0.05) increase in pre-emergence damping-off incidence. Post emergence damping-off increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the presence of pendimethalin and prometryn. Biocontrol activity of B. cepacia (isolate D1) in controlling cotton seedling damping-off was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by pendimethalin and prometryn in the microcosm experiments. In a field experiment conducted in Safford, Arizona, pre-plant application of pendimethalin or prometryn caused significant (P < 0.05) increases in disease incidence. In another field experiment in Tucson, Arizona, significant (P < 0.05) increase in disease incidence was observed in plots treated with prometryn. In both microcosm and field experiments, application of herbicides affected disease development as judged by the slope of disease progress curves. Biocontrol activity of an indigenous isolate (D1) of B. cepacia also was reduced significantly by pendimethalin and prometryn in both field experiments. Commercially available isolate (Deny®) of B. cepacia as a soil drench and as a seed treatment failed to protect cotton seedlings against R. solani-induced damping-off in both field experiments. The efficacy of commonly used fungicides (metalaxyl, triadimenol, thiram) against R. solani in the field was not significantly affected by herbicides in two field experiments at final assessment time. Pendimethalin and prometryn mediated changes in cotton seedling damping-off incidence and biocontrol activity of B. cepacia seem to be due to the changes in cotton seedlings susceptibility and changes in populations and structure of antagonistic bacteria in the plant rhizosphere.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn applied to soil increased pre-emergence damping-off incidence of cotton in microcosm experiments.

Treatment
prometryne1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
pre-emergence damping-off incidencee1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
microcosm experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of three pre-plant herbicides, pendimethalin, prometryn and trifluralin on the incidence and the development of Rhizoctonia solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the microcosm experiments application of prometryn, to the soil caused a significant (P < 0.05) increase in pre-emergence damping-off incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and prometryn significantly increased post-emergence damping-off of cotton seedlings.

Treatment
pendimethalin and prometryne2
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Post emergence damping-offe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of three pre-plant herbicides, pendimethalin, prometryn and trifluralin on the incidence and the development of Rhizoctonia solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“Post emergence damping-off increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the presence of pendimethalin and prometryn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and prometryn reduced the biocontrol activity of Burkholderia cepacia isolate D1 against Rhizoctonia solani in microcosm experiments.

Treatment
pendimethalin and prometryne3
Interactor
B. cepaciaBurkholderia cepaciae3biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Biocontrol activitye3
Direction
reducede3
Setting
microcosm experimentse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia cepacia
Burkholderia cepacia · InteractorPhoto Credit: CDC/Janice Carr Content Providers: CDC/Janice Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Second interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of three pre-plant herbicides, pendimethalin, prometryn and trifluralin on the incidence and the development of Rhizoctonia solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“Biocontrol activity of B. cepacia (isolate D1) in controlling cotton seedling damping-off was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by pendimethalin and prometryn in the microcosm experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-plant pendimethalin or prometryn significantly increased cotton disease incidence in a field experiment in Safford, Arizona.

Treatment
pre-plant application of pendimethalin or prometryne4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Direction
increasese4
Setting
Safford, Arizonae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of three pre-plant herbicides, pendimethalin, prometryn and trifluralin on the incidence and the development of Rhizoctonia solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e4

“In a field experiment conducted in Safford, Arizona, pre-plant application of pendimethalin or prometryn caused significant (P < 0.05) increases in disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn significantly increased cotton disease incidence in a field experiment in Tucson, Arizona.

Treatment
prometryne5
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee5
Direction
increasee5
Setting
Tucson, Arizonae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The impact of three pre-plant herbicides, pendimethalin, prometryn and trifluralin on the incidence and the development of Rhizoctonia solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e5

“In another field experiment in Tucson, Arizona, significant (P < 0.05) increase in disease incidence was observed in plots treated with prometryn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application affected cotton disease development in both microcosm and field experiments, judged by the slope of disease progress curves.

Treatment
application of herbicidese6
Outcome
disease developmente6
Setting
microcosm and field experimentse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e6

“In both microcosm and field experiments, application of herbicides affected disease development as judged by the slope of disease progress curves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and prometryn significantly reduced the biocontrol activity of an indigenous B. cepacia isolate (D1) in field experiments.

Material
isolate (D1)e7
Treatment
pendimethalin and prometryne7
Interactor
B. cepaciaBurkholderia cepaciae7biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Biocontrol activitye7
Direction
reducede7
Setting
field experimentse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia cepacia
Burkholderia cepacia · InteractorPhoto Credit: CDC/Janice Carr Content Providers: CDC/Janice Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“Biocontrol activity of an indigenous isolate (D1) of B. cepacia also was reduced significantly by pendimethalin and prometryn in both field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The commercial B. cepacia isolate failed to protect cotton seedlings against Rhizoctonia solani damping-off in field experiments.

Treatment
as a soil drench and as a seed treatmente1
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
B. cepaciaBurkholderia cepaciae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protect cotton seedlings against R. solani-induced damping-offe1
Direction
failede1
Setting
field experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Burkholderia cepacia
Burkholderia cepacia · Second interactorPhoto Credit: CDC/Janice Carr Content Providers: CDC/Janice Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“of B. cepacia as a soil drench and as a seed treatment failed to protect cotton seedlings against R. solani-induced damping-off in both field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides did not significantly change the efficacy of commonly used fungicides against Rhizoctonia solani in two field experiments.

Treatment
herbicidese1
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Compound
metalaxyl, triadimenol, thirame1
Outcome
efficacy of commonly used fungicidese1
Direction
not significantly affectede1
Setting
two field experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of commonly used fungicides (metalaxyl, triadimenol, thiram) against R. solani in the field was not significantly affected by herbicides in two field experiments at final assessment time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2128 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and prometryn may act by changing cotton seedling susceptibility and the antagonistic bacterial populations in the rhizosphere.

Treatment
Pendimethalin and prometryne1
Outcome
cotton seedling damping-off incidencee1
Qualifier
changes in cotton seedlings susceptibilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pendimethalin and prometryn mediated changes in cotton seedling damping-off incidence and biocontrol activity of B. cepacia seem to be due to the changes in cotton seedlings susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2130–2318 · show in text ↑

prometryn · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

pendimethalin · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

application · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.