Paper · 1987 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

The Effects of Cotton Leaf Crumple on Greenhouse-Grown Cotton Incoulated at Five Growth Stages

J. D. Mihail; Judith K. Brown; M. R. Nelson

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages. As a result of virus infection, the total leaf area was reduced and significant reductions in yield were observed, regardless of plant age at time of inoculation. Yield reductions resulted from a smaller number of bolls set and/or a decrease in boll weight. Foliar symptoms were associated with plants inoculated at all five growth stages, but were observed sooner and were more severe for plants inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8, and 8-10 leaf stages than those inoculated at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection reduced total leaf area of greenhouse-grown cotton.

Treatment
virus infectione1
Interactor
viruse1pathogen
Outcome
total leaf areae1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
Greenhouse-Grownt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greenhouse-Grown Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“As a result of virus infection, the total leaf area was reduced and significant reductions in yield were observed, regardless of plant age at time of inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection caused significant reductions in cotton yield regardless of plant age at inoculation.

Treatment
virus infectione1
Interactor
viruse1pathogen
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
significant reductionse1
Qualifier
regardless of plant age at time of inoculatione1
Setting
Greenhouse-Grownt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Greenhouse-Grown Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“As a result of virus infection, the total leaf area was reduced and significant reductions in yield were observed, regardless of plant age at time of inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection lowered cotton yield through a smaller number of bolls set.

Treatment
virus infectione1
Interactor
viruse1pathogen
Outcome
number of bolls sete2
Direction
smallere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“As a result of virus infection, the total leaf area was reduced and significant reductions in yield were observed, regardless of plant age at time of inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–312 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield reductions resulted from a smaller number of bolls set and/or a decrease in boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection lowered cotton yield through decreased boll weight.

Treatment
virus infectione1
Interactor
viruse1pathogen
Outcome
boll weighte2
Direction
decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“As a result of virus infection, the total leaf area was reduced and significant reductions in yield were observed, regardless of plant age at time of inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–312 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield reductions resulted from a smaller number of bolls set and/or a decrease in boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton inoculated at all five growth stages showed foliar symptoms.

Treatment
inoculated at all five growth stagese3
Outcome
Foliar symptomse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar symptoms were associated with plants inoculated at all five growth stages, but were observed sooner and were more severe for plants inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8, and 8-10 leaf stages than those inoculated at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar symptoms appeared sooner in cotton inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8 and 8-10 leaf stages than at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stages.

Treatment
inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8, and 8-10 leaf stagese3
Outcome
Foliar symptomse3
Direction
observed soonere3
Comparator
inoculated at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stagese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar symptoms were associated with plants inoculated at all five growth stages, but were observed sooner and were more severe for plants inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8, and 8-10 leaf stages than those inoculated at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar symptoms were more severe in cotton inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8 and 8-10 leaf stages than at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stages.

Treatment
inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8, and 8-10 leaf stagese3
Outcome
Foliar symptomse3
Direction
more severee3
Comparator
inoculated at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stagese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of cotton leaf crumple disease on components of yield and on symptom expression were examined for cotton inoculated at five growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar symptoms were associated with plants inoculated at all five growth stages, but were observed sooner and were more severe for plants inoculated at the 2-3, 5-8, and 8-10 leaf stages than those inoculated at the 14-16 or 18-20 leaf stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–652 · show in text ↑

stage · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 3 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

infection · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 18 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.