Paper · 2007 · Food Additives & Contaminants

Mycotoxin occurrence and Aspergillus flavus soil propagules in a corn and cotton glyphosate-resistant cropping systems

K. N. Reddy; H. K. Abbas; R. M. Zablotowicz; et al.

13
claims
14
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of cotton-corn rotation and glyphosate use on levels of soil-borne Aspergillus flavus, aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination in corn and cotton seed were determined during 2002-2005 in Stoneville, Mississippi (USA). There were four rotation systems (continuous cotton, continuous corn, cotton-corn and corn-cotton) for both glyphosate-resistant (GR) and non-GR cultivars-herbicide system arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Aspergillus flavus populations in surface (5-cm depth) soil, sampled before planting (March/April), mid-season June) and after harvest (September), ranged from 1.47 to 2.99 log (10) cfu g(-1) soil in the four rotation systems. Propagules of A. flavus were higher in the continuous corn system compared to the continuous cotton system on three sample dates, and cotton rotated with corn decreased A. flavus propagules in three of nine sample dates. Propagules of A. flavus were significantly greater in plots with GR cultivars compared to non-GR cultivars in three samples. In cotton seed, aflatoxin and fumonisin levels were similar (< or = 4 microg kg(-1) and non-detectable, respectively) regardless of rotation and glyphosate. In corn grain, aflatoxin was above the regulatory level (> or = 20 microg kg(-1)) only in GR cultivar in 2004 and 2005. Fumonisin was higher in non-GR cultivar (4 mg kg(-1)) regardless of rotation in 2004; however, in 2002, 2003 and 2005, aflatoxin and fumonisin levels were similar regardless of rotation and glyphosate. These results indicate the potential for increased aflatoxin and fumonisin levels (1 of 4 years) in corn; however, climatic conditions encountered during this study did not allow for mycotoxin production. In laboratory incubation studies, fairly high concentrations of glyphosate were required to inhibit A. flavus growth; however no short-term effect of soil treatment with glyphosate on A. flavus populations were observed. These data suggest that altered populations of A. flavus or higher aflatoxin concentrations in corn grain were due to indirect effects of the GR cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. flavus propagules in soil were higher in continuous corn than in continuous cotton on three sample dates.

Treatment
continuous corn systeme1
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
Propagules of A. flavuse1
Direction
highere1
Value
three sample datese1
Comparator
continuous cotton systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Propagules of A. flavus were higher in the continuous corn system compared to the continuous cotton system on three sample dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton rotated with corn decreased A. flavus propagules in three of nine sample dates.

Treatment
rotated with corne1
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
A. flavus propagulese1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
three of nine sample datese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cotton rotated with corn decreased A. flavus propagules in three of nine sample dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A. flavus propagules were significantly greater in plots with glyphosate-resistant cultivars than with non-GR cultivars in three samples.

Treatment
GR cultivarse1
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
Propagules of A. flavuse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
three samplese1
Comparator
non-GR cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Propagules of A. flavus were significantly greater in plots with GR cultivars compared to non-GR cultivars in three samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn and cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aflatoxin levels in cotton seed were similar (at most 4 microg kg(-1)) regardless of rotation and glyphosate.

Treatment
rotation and glyphosatee1
Outcome
aflatoxine1
Direction
similare1
Value
< or = 4 microg kg(-1)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In cotton seed, aflatoxin and fumonisin levels were similar (< or = 4 microg kg(-1) and non-detectable, respectively) regardless of rotation and glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumonisin levels in cotton seed were similar (non-detectable) regardless of rotation and glyphosate.

Treatment
rotation and glyphosatee1
Outcome
fumonisin levelse1
Direction
similare1
Value
non-detectablee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In cotton seed, aflatoxin and fumonisin levels were similar (< or = 4 microg kg(-1) and non-detectable, respectively) regardless of rotation and glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In corn grain, aflatoxin was above the regulatory level (at least 20 microg kg(-1)) only in the GR cultivar in 2004 and 2005.

Treatment
GR cultivare1
Outcome
aflatoxine1
Direction
abovee1
Value
> or = 20 microg kg(-1)e1
Qualifier
2004 and 2005e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In corn grain, aflatoxin was above the regulatory level (> or = 20 microg kg(-1)) only in GR cultivar in 2004 and 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumonisin was higher in the non-GR cultivar (4 mg kg(-1)) regardless of rotation in 2004.

Treatment
non-GR cultivare1
Outcome
Fumonisine1
Direction
highere1
Value
4 mg kg(-1)e1
Qualifier
regardless of rotation in 2004e1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Fumonisin was higher in non-GR cultivar (4 mg kg(-1)) regardless of rotation in 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, 2003 and 2005, aflatoxin and fumonisin levels were similar regardless of rotation and glyphosate.

Treatment
rotation and glyphosatee1
Outcome
aflatoxin and fumonisin levelse1
Direction
similare1
Qualifier
2002, 2003 and 2005e1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e1

“in 2002, 2003 and 2005, aflatoxin and fumonisin levels were similar regardless of rotation and glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In laboratory incubation, fairly high glyphosate concentrations were required to inhibit A. flavus growth.

Taxon
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1
Treatment
glyphosatee1
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
A. flavus growthe1
Direction
inhibite1
Qualifier
fairly high concentrationse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · TaxonUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“fairly high concentrations of glyphosate were required to inhibit A. flavus growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No short-term effect of soil treatment with glyphosate on A. flavus populations was observed.

Taxon
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1
Treatment
soil treatment with glyphosatee1
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
A. flavus populationse1
Direction
no short-term effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · TaxonUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“no short-term effect of soil treatment with glyphosate on A. flavus populations were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1947 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that altered A. flavus populations or higher aflatoxin in corn grain were due to indirect effects of the glyphosate-resistant cropping system.

Treatment
GR cropping systeme1
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
altered populations of A. flavuse1
Qualifier
indirect effectse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“altered populations of A. flavus or higher aflatoxin concentrations in corn grain were due to indirect effects of the GR cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2109 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state the results indicate a potential for increased aflatoxin and fumonisin levels in corn (1 of 4 years).

Outcome
increased aflatoxin and fumonisin levelse1
Value
1 of 4 yearse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results indicate the potential for increased aflatoxin and fumonisin levels (1 of 4 years) in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Aspergillus flavus populations ranged from 1.47 to 2.99 log (10) cfu g(-1) soil across the four rotation systems.

Taxon
Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavuse1
Interactor
Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
Aspergillus flavus populationse1
Value
1.47 to 2.99 log (10) cfu g(-1) soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · TaxonUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Aspergillus flavus populations in surface (5-cm depth) soil, sampled before planting (March/April), mid-season June) and after harvest (September), ranged from 1.47 to 2.99 log (10) cfu g(-1) soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–667 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

rotation · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rotation · Aspergillus flavus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.